Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTES-AT-LARGE · Vol. 49 STAT. · June 25, 1929 · Public Law 611

Public Law 611.

536 words·~2 min read·/statutes-at-large/vol-49/public-law-611·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(/us/pl/74/610).] *Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled*, That in the suitNorthern Pacific Railway Company and others.Review by appeal to U. S. Supreme Court of certain questions in pending suit, authorized.Vol. 46, p. 41. entitled United States of America, plaintiff, against Northern Pacific Railway Company and others, defendants, numbered E-4389, instituted and pending in the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Washington, under the authority and direction of the Act of June 25, 1929 (ch. 41, 46 Stat.
L. 41), now on reference to a special master for hearing under an order of said court entered in said suit on April 21, 1936, a direct review by the 1370Supreme Court of the United States by appeal may be had by any party to said suit of any order or decree of said district court entered upon a review of the report of the master to be made pursuant to said order of April 21, 1936, and also of the order or decree of said district court entered in said suit on October 3, 1935, as amended by Time limitation.an order of January 29, 1936.
Such direct review by the Supreme Court of either or both of the said orders or decrees may be had by appeal taken within sixty days from the date of the order or decree of the district court entered upon a review of the report of the Right of review of final Judgment not affected.master to be made pursuant to the said order of April 21, 1936. The right of review of any final judgment, authorized by said Act of June 25, 1929, shall continue in force and effect. Approved, May 22, 1936.
To provide for the establishment of a Coast Guard station at or near Crescent City, California. 1936-05-22 49 Stat. 1370 445 Chapter 74 2 United States Government Publishing Office text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. Digitization Vendor 2025-01-07 public [CHAPTER 445.] AN ACT To provide for the establishment of a Coast Guard station at or near Crescent City, California.
May 22, 1936.[[H. R. 1308](/us/bill/74/hr/1308).][[Public, No. 611](/us/pl/74/611).] *Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled*,Crescent City, Calif.Establishment of Coast Guard station at, authorized. That the Secretary of the Treasury be, and he is hereby, authorized to establish a Coast Guard station on the Pacific coast at or in the vicinity of Crescent City, California, in such locality as the Commandant of the Coast Guard may recommend.
Approved, May 22, 1936. To provide for the establishment of a Coast Guard station at Port Washington, Wisconsin. 1936-05-22 49 Stat. 1370 446 Chapter 74 2 United States Government Publishing Office text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. Digitization Vendor 2025-01-07 public [CHAPTER 446.] AN ACT To provide for the establishment of a Coast Guard station at Port Washington, Wisconsin.
May 22, 1936.[[H. R. 8370](/us/bill/74/hr/8370).][
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
Citation graph
cites case law
Public Law 611
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.