Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTES-AT-LARGE · Vol. 49 STAT. · May 29, 1936 · Private Law 587

Private Law 587.

509 words·~2 min read·/statutes-at-large/vol-49/private-law-587·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(/us/pvt/74/586)] *Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,* That jurisdiction isFrank P. Ross.Claim of, referred to Court of Claims. hereby conferred upon the Court of Claims to hear, determine, and render judgment upon the claim of Frank P. Ross, of Tacoma, Washington, against the United States, for damages arising out of the patenting to another person of lands in Pacific County, Washington, which had been selected or entered by said Frank P.
Ross under the homestead laws, and for damages arising out of the subsequent cutting of timber from such lands. Sec. 2. Suit upon such claim may be instituted at any time withinCommencement of suit. one year after the date of enactment of this Act, notwithstanding the lapse of time or any statute of limitations. Proceedings for theProceedings, etc. determination of such claim, and appeals from and payment of any judgment thereon shall be in the same manner as in the case of claims over which said Court has jurisdiction under section 145 of[U.
S. C., p. 1261](/us/usc/p1261). the Judicial Code, as amended. Approved, May 29, 1936. For the relief of Earl A. Ross. 1936-05-29 475 Chapter 49 Stat. 2307 United States Government Publishing Office text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. Digitization Vendor 2025-01-07 74 2 private [CHAPTER 475.] AN ACT For the relief of Earl A. Ross. May 29, 1936.[[S. 1490](/us/bill/74/s/1490)][[Private, No. 587](/us/pvt/74/587)] *Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,* That jurisdictionEarl A.
Ross.Claim of, referred to Court of Claims. is hereby conferred upon the Court of Claims to hear, determine, and render judgment upon the claim of Earl A. Ross, of Chicago. Illinois, for damages arising out of the patenting to another person of lands in Pacific County, Washington, which had been selected or entered by said Earl A. Ross under the homestead laws, and for damages arising out of the subsequent cutting of timber from such lands. Sec. 2. Suit upon such claim may be instituted at any time withinCommencement of suit. one year after the date of enactment of this Act, notwithstanding the lapse of time or any statute of limitations.
Proceedings forProceedings, etc. the determination of such claim, and appeals from and payment of any judgment thereon shall be in the same manner as in the case of claims over which said Court has jurisdiction under section 145 of[U. 8. C., p. 1261](/us/usc/p1261). the Judicial Code, as amended. Approved, May 29, 1936. For the relief of C. O. Meyer. 1936-06-02 480 Chapter 49 Stat. 2307 United States Government Publishing Office text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
Digitization Vendor 2025-01-07 74 2 private [CHAPTER 480.] AN ACT For the relief of C. O. Meyer. June 2, 1936.[[S. 537](/us/bill/74/s/537)][
Connectionstraces to 1
Citation graph
cites case law
Private Law 587
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.