Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTES-AT-LARGE · Vol. 48 STAT. · June 26, 1933 · Private Law 417

Private Law 417.

507 words·~2 min read·/statutes-at-large/vol-48/private-law-417·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(/us/pvtl/73/416).] *Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled*, Church of the Good Shepherd, Memphis, Tenn.Refund of duty on candlesticks, etc. That the Secretary of the Treasury be, and he hereby is, authorized and directed to refund or abate the customs duty (consumption entry numbered 023, June 26, 1933) assessed on altar candlesticks and cross imported by Canon Hiram K. Douglass for the Church of the Good Shepherd, Memphis, Tennessee.
Approved, June 26, 1934. For the relief of the D. F. Tyler Corporation and the Norfolk Dredging Company. 1934-06-26 841 Chapter 48 Stat. 1460 73 2 United States Government Publishing Office text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. Digitization Vendor 2024-12-11 private [CHAPTER 841.] AN ACT For the relief of the D. F. Tyler Corporation and the Norfolk Dredging Company.
June 26, 1934.[[H.R. 7163](/us/bill/73/hr/7163).][[Private, No. 417](/us/pvtl/73/417).] *Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled*, D. F. Tyler Corporation and the Norfolk Dredging Company.Payment of court judgments. That the Secretary of the Treasury be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to pay to the D. F. Tyler Corporation and the Norfolk Dredging Company jointly $14,727.11, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, in full settlement of all claims against the Government of the United States by reason of court judgments and claims against them on account of dumping of dredged material on certain oysters, oyster grounds, and marshlands, under a contract dated January 19, 1931, between the United States and the said D.
F. Tyler Corporation, for dredging in the Nansemond *Proviso*.Limitation on attorney’s, etc., fees.River, Virginia: *Provided*, That no part of the amount appropriated in this Act in excess of 10 per centum thereof shall be paid or delivered to or received by any agent or agents, attorney or attorneys, on account of services rendered in connection with said claim. It shall be unlawful for any agent or agents, attorney or attorneys, to exact, collect, withhold, or receive any sum of the amount appropriated in this Act in excess of 10 per centum thereof on account of services rendered in connection with said claim, any contract to Penalty for violation.the contrary notwithstanding.
Any person violating the provisions of this Act shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in any sum not exceeding $1,000. Approved, June 26, 1934. For the relief of the Boston Store Company, a corporation, Chicago, Illinois 1934-06-26 842 Chapter 48 Stat. 1461 73 2 United States Government Publishing Office text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
Digitization Vendor 2024-12-11 private 1461 [CHAPTER 842.] AN ACT For the relief of the Boston Store Company, a corporation, Chicago, Illinois June 26, 1934.[[H.R. 7292](/us/bill/73/hr/7292).][
Connectionstraces to 2
Citation graph
cites case law
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.