Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTES-AT-LARGE · Vol. 43 STAT. · April 12, 1924 · Chapter 96

Chapter 96. Granting the consent of Congress to the counties of Sibley and Scott, Minnesota, to construct a bridge across the Minnesota River

195 words·~1 min read·/statutes-at-large/vol-43/chapter-96-523165·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

CHAP. 96.— An Act Granting the consent of Congress to the counties of Sibley and Scott, Minnesota, to construct a bridge across the Minnesota River. April 12, 1924.[[H. R. 6724](/us/bill/68/hr/6724).][[Public, No. 80](/us/pl/68/80).] *Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, * Minnesota River.Sibley and Scott Counties, Minn., may bridge, at Blakely. That the consent of Congress is hereby granted to the counties of Sibley and Scott of the State of Minnesota and their successors and assigns, to construct, maintain, and operate a bridge and approaches thereto across the Minnesota River at a point suitable to the interests of navigation, at or near Blakely, Minnesota, more particularly described as in section 8, township numbered 113 north of range 25 west of the fifth principal meridian in the counties of Sibley and Scott, in the State of Minnesota, in accordance with the provisions of an Act Construction.Vol. 34, p. 84.entitled “An Act to regulate the construction of bridges over navigable waters,” approved March 23, 1906.
Sec. 2. Amendment. That the right to alter, amend, or repeal this Act is hereby expressly reserved. Approved, April 12, 1924.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.