Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTES-AT-LARGE · Vol. 42 STAT. · June 25, 1921 · Chapter 29

Chapter 29. Authorizing the appointment of an additional judge for the district of North Dakota

219 words·~1 min read·/statutes-at-large/vol-42/chapter-29-400805·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

CHAP. 29.— An Act Authorizing the appointment of an additional judge for the district of North Dakota. June 25, 1921.[S. 78.][[Public, No. 24](/us/pl/67/24).] *Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled*,North Dakota Judicial district.Additional judge authorized for.Vol. 36, p. 1087, amended. That the President of the United States, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint an additional judge of the District Court of the United States for the judicial district of the State of North Dakota, who shall possess the same powers, perform the same duties, and receive the 67same compensation and allowance as the present judge of said district, and the judge so appointed shall be held and treated as the senior To act as senior judge.judge and shall exercise such powers and perform such duties in that judicial district as may be incident to seniority.
Sec. 2. That whenever a vacancy shall occur in the office of the Vacancy in office of judge senior in commission not to be filleddistrict judge for the district of North Dakota, by the retirement, disqualification, or death of the judge senior in commission, such vacancy shall not be filled, and thereafter there shall be but one district judge in said district. Approved, June 25, 1921.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.