Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTES-AT-LARGE · Vol. 41 STAT. · September 17, 1919 · Chapter 62

Chapter 62. Granting the consent of Congress to the D

198 words·~1 min read·/statutes-at-large/vol-41/chapter-62-1241333·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

CHAP. 62.— An Act Granting the consent of Congress to the D. E. Hewit Lumber Company to construct and maintain a bridge across Tug River, connecting Martin County, Kentucky, and Mingo County, West Virginia. September 17, 1919. [[S. 2700](/us/bill/66/s/2700).] [[Public, No. 50](/us/pl/66/50).] *Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,* That the consent of Congress Tug River.D. E. Hewit Lumber Company may bridge, Kermit, W.Va.is hereby granted to the D.
E. Hewit Lumber Company, and its successors and assigns, to construct, maintain, and operate a bridge and approaches thereto across the Tug River at a point suitable to the interests of navigation, one end of said bridge being in Martin County, Kentucky, and the other end of the said bridge being on the opposite side of the Tug River, at Kermit, in Mingo County, in the State of Construction.Vol. 34, p. 84.West Virginia, in accordance with the provisions of the Act entitled “An Act to regulate the construction of bridges over navigable waters,” approved March 23, 1906.
Sec. 2. That the right to alter, amend, or repeal this Act is hereby Amendment.expressly reserved. Approved, September 17, 1919.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.