Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTES-AT-LARGE · Vol. 36 STAT. · February 26, 1910 · Chapter 64

Chapter 64. Authorizing the construction of a bridge across the Connecticut River, in the State of Connecticut, between the towns of Old Saybrook and Old Lyme

184 words·~1 min read·/statutes-at-large/vol-36/chapter-64-1015830·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

CHAP. 64.— An Act Authorizing the construction of a bridge across the Connecticut River, in the State of Connecticut, between the towns of Old Saybrook and Old Lyme. February 26, 1910.[[S. 5680](/us/bill/61/s/5680).][[Public, No. 64](/us/pl/61/64).] *Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled*, Connecticut River.Saybrook and Lyme Connecticut Bridge Commission may bridge, between Old Saybrook and Old Lyme, Conn.
That the State of Connecticut, acting through the Saybrook and Lyme Connecticut River Bridge Commission, a commission created by the laws of the State of Connecticut, be, and hereby is, authorized to construct and maintain a drawbridge across the Connecticut River, at a point suitable to the interests of navigation, between the towns of Old Saybrook and Old Lyme, in the State of Connecticut, in accordance with the provisions of the Vol. 34, p. 84.Act entitled “An Act to regulate the construction of bridges over navigable waters,” approved March twenty-third, nineteen hundred and six.
Sec. 2. Amendment. That the right to alter, amend, or repeal this Act is hereby expressly reserved. Approved, February 26, 1910.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.