Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTES-AT-LARGE · Vol. 35 STAT. · March 10, 1908 · Chapter 76

Chapter 76. Restricting in certain cases the right of appeal to the Supreme Court in habeas corpus proceedings

157 words·~1 min read·/statutes-at-large/vol-35/chapter-76-247719·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

CHAP. 76.— An Act Restricting in certain cases the right of appeal to the Supreme Court in habeas corpus proceedings. March 10, 1908.[[H. R. 4777](/us/bill/70/hr/4777).][[Public, No. 46](/us/pl/70/46).] *Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled*, That from a final decisionUnited States courts.Habeas corpus appeals from State courts to Supreme Court restricted. by a court of the United States in a proceeding in habeas corpus where the detention complained of is by virtue of process issued out of a State court no appeal to the Supreme Court shall be allowed unless the United States court by which the final decision was rendered or a justice of the Supreme Court shall be of opinion that there exists probable cause for an appeal, in which event, on allowing the same, the said court or justice shall certify that there is probable cause for such allowance.
Approved, March 10, 1908.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.