Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTES-AT-LARGE · Vol. 34 STAT. · June 11, 1906 · Chapter 3076

Chapter 3076. For the extension of Euclid street, in Meridian Hill, District of Columbia

1,623 words·~7 min read·/statutes-at-large/vol-34/chapter-3076-1199972·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

CHAP. 3076.— An Act For the extension of Euclid street, in Meridian Hill, District of Columbia. June 11, 1906. [[S. 2623](/us/bill/34/s/2623).] [[Public, No. 222](/us/pl/34/222).] *Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled*, District of Columbia.Extension of Euclid street.Proceedings to condemn lands for. That within sixty days after the passage of this Act the Commissioners of the District of Columbia be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to institute in the supreme court of the District of Columbia, sitting as a district court, by petition particularly describing the lands to be taken, a proceeding in rein to condemn the land that may be necessary for the extension of Euclid street, in a straight line with a width of fifty feet, from Champlain street to Columbia road.
Sec. 2. Assessment of damages and benefits.That the entire amount found to be due and awarded as damages for and in respect of the land condemned for the extension of Euclid street as herein provided shall be assessed by the jury hereinafter provided for as benefits, and to the extent of such benefits, against those pieces or parcels of land on each side of said street as extended, and also on any or all pieces or parcels of land which will he benefited by the extension of said street as said jury may find said pieces or parcels of land will be benefited, and in determining the amounts to be assessed against said pieces or parcels of lands the jury shall take into consideration the respective situations of such pieces or parcels of land and the benefits they may severally receive from the extension of said street as aforesaid, and the verdict of said jury shall also be for 237a sufficient sum to cover all the costs of the condemnation proceedings herein provided for.
Sec. 3. That the said court shall cause public notice of not less thanNotice of proceedings.Advertisement. ten days to be given of the tiling of said proceedings, by advertisement in such manner as the court shall prescribe, which notice shall warn all persons having any interest in the proceedings to attend court at a day to be named in said notice and to continue in attendance until the court shall have made its final order ratifying and confirming the award of damages and assessment of benefits of the jury; and in additionPersonal notice. to such public notice said court, whenever in its judgment it is practicable to do so, may cause a copy of said notice to be served by the marshal of the District of Columbia or his deputies upon such owners of the land to be condemned as may be found by said marshal or his deputies within the District of Columbia.
Sec. 4. That after the return of the marshal and the filing of proofMarshal’s jury. of publication of the notice provided for in the preceding section, said court shall cause a jury of seven judicious, disinterested men, not related to any person interested in the proceedings, and not in the service or employment of the District of Columbia or of the United States, to be summoned by the marshal of the District of Columbia, to which jurorsDuties. said court shall administer an oath or affirmation that they are not interested in any manner in the land to be condemned nor are in any way related to the parties interested therein, and that they will, without favor or partiality, to the best of their judgment, assess the damages each owner of land taken may sustain by reason of the extension of said street and the condemnation of lands for the purposes of such extension, and assess the benefits resulting therefrom as hereinbefore provided.
TheHearings of objections. court, before accepting the jury, shall hear any objections that may be made to any member thereof, and shall have full power to decide upon all such objections and to excuse any juror or cause any vacancy in the jury, when impaneled to be filled; and after said jury shall have been organized and shall have viewed the premises, said jury shall proceed, in the presence of the court, if the court shall so direct, or otherwise as the court may direct, to hear and receive such evidence as may be offered or submitted on behalf of the District of Columbia and by any person or persons having any interest in the proceedings for the extension of said street.
When the hearing is concluded the jury, or a majority ofVerdict. them, shall return to said court, in writing, its verdict of the amount to be found due and payable as damages sustained by reason of the extension of said street under the provisions thereof, and of the pieces or parcels of land benefited by such extension and the amount of the assessment for such benefits against the same, including its proportionate share of the cost of the condemnation proceedings heroin provided for.
Sec. 5. That if the use of a part only of any piece or parcelDetermining value of parts of lots. of ground shall be condemned, the jury, in determining its value, shall not take into consideration any benefits that may accrue to the remainder thereof from the extension of said street or highway, but such benefits shall be considered in determining what assessment shall be made on or against such part of such piece or parcel of land as may not be taken as hereinbefore provided.
Sec. 6. That the court shall have power to hear and determine anyReview of verdict. objections which may be tiled to said verdict or award, and to set aside and vacate the same, in whole or in part, when satisfied that it is unjust or unreasonable, and in such event a new jury shall be summoned, whoNew jury. shall proceed to assess the damages or benefits, as the case may be, in respect of the land as to which the verdict may be vacated, as in the case of the first jury: *Provided,* That if vacated in part, the residue*Provisos.*Action if vacated in part. of the verdict and award as to the land condemned or assessed shall not be affected thereby: *And provided further,* That the exceptions or objections to the verdict and award shall be filed within thirty daysFiling exceptions. after the return of such verdict and award. 238 Sec. 7.
Payment of verdict.That when the verdict of said jury shall have been finally ratified and confirmed by the court, as herein provided, the amounts of money awarded and adjudged to be payable for lands taken under the provisions hereof shall be paid to the owners of said land by the disbursing officer of the District of Columbia from moneys advance to him by the Secretary of the Treasury upon requisitions of the Commissioners Appropriation from District revenues.of said District, as provided by law; and a sufficient sum to pay the amounts of said judgments and awards is hereby appropriated from the revenues of the District of Columbia.
Sec. 8. Collection of assessments.That when confirmed by the court, the several assessments herein provided to be made shall severally be a lien upon the land assessed, and shall be collected as special improvement taxes in the District of Columbia, and shall be payable in two equal annual installments, with interest at the rate of four per centum per annum from and after sixty days after the confirmation of the verdict and award. Damage awards deducted from benefits.In all cases of payments the accounting officers shall take into account the assessment for benefits and the award for damages, and shall pay only such part of said award in respect of any lot as may be in excess of the assessment for benefits against the part of such lot not taken, and there shall be credited on said assessment the amount of said award not in excess of said assessment.
Sec. 9. Proceedings.That said court may allow amendments in form or substance in any petition, process, record, or proceeding, or in the description of property proposed to be taken, or of property assessed for benefits whenever such amendments will not interfere with the substantial rights of the parties interested. Sec. 10. Compensation of jurors.That each juror shall receive as compensation the sum of five dollars per day for his services during the time he shall be actually engaged in such services under the provisions hereof.
Sec. 11. Appropriation for expenses.That the sum of three hundred dollars is hereby appropriated, out of the revenues of the District of Columbia, to provide the necessary funds for the costs and expenses of the condemnationReimbursement. proceedings taken pursuant hereto, to be repaid to the District of Columbia from said assessments for benefits when the same are collected as herein provided. Sec. 12. Appeals not to delay opening of street, etc.That no appeal by any interested party from the decision of the supreme court of the District of Columbia confirming the assessment or assessments of benefits or damages herein provided for, nor any other proceeding at law or in equity by such party against the confirmation of such assessment or assessments, shall delay or prevent the payment of award to others in respect to the property condemned, nor delay or prevent the taking of any of said property sought to be *Proviso*.Payment of final decision.condemned, nor the opening of such street: *Provided, however,* That upon the final determination of said appeal or other proceeding at law or in equity the amount found to be due and payable as damages sustained by reason of the extension of said street under the provisions hereof shall be paid as hereinbefore provided.
Approved, June 11, 1906.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.