Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTE-COMPILATIONS · Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 · Sec. 426

Sec. 426. BUDGET OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY

481 words·~2 min read·/statute-compilations/comps-9631/sec-426

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

## SEC. 426 BUDGET OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Subsection
(f)of section 17 of the Central Intelligence Agency Act of 1949 (50 U.S.C. 403q) is amended— ####
(1)by inserting “(1)” before “Beginning”; and ####
(2)by adding at the end the following new paragraph: > > #### “(2) > > For each fiscal year, the Inspector General shall transmit a budget estimate and request through the Director to the Director of National Intelligence that specifies for such fiscal year— > > > ##### “(A) > > the aggregate amount requested for the operations of the Inspector General; > > > ##### “(B) > > the amount requested for all training requirements of the Inspector General, including a certification from the Inspector General that the amount requested is sufficient to fund all training requirements for the Office; and > > > ##### “(C) > > the amount requested to support the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency, including a justification for such amount. > > > #### “(3) > > In transmitting a proposed budget to the President for a fiscal year, the Director of National Intelligence shall include for such fiscal year— > > > ##### “(A) > > the aggregate amount requested for the Inspector General of the Central Intelligence Agency; > > > ##### “(B) > > the amount requested for Inspector General training; > > > ##### “(C) > > the amount requested to support the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency; and > > > ##### “(D) > > the comments of the Inspector General, if any, with respect to such proposed budget. > > > #### “(4) > > The Director of National Intelligence shall submit to the Committee on Appropriations and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate and the Committee on Appropriations and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives for each fiscal year— > > > ##### “(A) > > a separate statement of the budget estimate transmitted pursuant to paragraph (2); > > > ##### “(B) > > the amount requested by the Director of National Intelligence for the Inspector General pursuant to paragraph (3)(A); > > > ##### “(C) > > the amount requested by the Director of National Intelligence for training of personnel of the Office of the Inspector General pursuant to paragraph (3)(B); > > > ##### “(D) > > the amount requested by the Director of National Intelligence for support for the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency pursuant to paragraph (3)(C); and > > > ##### “(E) > > the comments of the Inspector General under paragraph (3)(D), if any, on the amounts requested pursuant to paragraph (3), including whether such amounts would substantially inhibit the Inspector General from performing the duties of the Office.” > .
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 426
BUDGET OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.