Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTE-COMPILATIONS · Restoring GI Bill Fairness Act of 2011 · Sec. 2

Sec. 2. PRESERVATION OF HIGHER RATES FOR TUITION AND FEES FOR PROGRAMS OF EDUCATION AT NON-PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER LEARNING PURSUED BY INDIVIDUALS ENROLLED IN SUCH PROGRAMS PRIOR TO CHANGE IN MAXIMUM AMOUNT

400 words·~2 min read·/statute-compilations/comps-9613/sec-2

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

## SEC. 2 PRESERVATION OF HIGHER RATES FOR TUITION AND FEES FOR PROGRAMS OF EDUCATION AT NON-PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER LEARNING PURSUED BY INDIVIDUALS ENROLLED IN SUCH PROGRAMS PRIOR TO CHANGE IN MAXIMUM AMOUNT **[**[38 U.S.C. 3313 note](/us/usc/t38/s3313)**]** ###
(a)In General Notwithstanding paragraph (1)(A)(ii) of section 3313(c) of title 38, United States Code (as amended by the Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Improvements Act of 2010 (Public Law 111-377)), the amount payable under that paragraph (or as appropriately adjusted under paragraphs
(2)through
(7)of that section) for tuition and fees for pursuit by an individual described in subsection
(b)of an approved program of education at a non-public institution of higher learning during the period beginning on August 1, 2011, and ending on July 31, 2014, shall be the greater of— ####
(1)$17,500; or ####
(2)the established charges payable for the program of education determined using the table of the Department of Veterans Affairs entitled “Post-9/11 GI Bill 2010-2011 Tuition and Fee In-State Maximums”, published October 27, 2010 (75 Fed. Reg. 66193), as if that table applied to the pursuit of the program of education by that individual during that period. ###
(b)Covered Individuals An individual described in this subsection is an individual entitled to educational assistance under chapter 33 of title 38, United States Code, who, since January 4, 2011, has been enrolled in the same non-public institution of higher learning in a State in which— ####
(1)the maximum amount of tuition per credit in the 2010-2011 academic year, as determined pursuant to the table referred to in subsection (a)(2), exceeded $700; and ####
(2)the combined amount of tuition and fees for full-time attendance in the program of education in such academic year exceeded $17,500. ###
(c)Definitions In this section: ####
(1)The term “approved program of education” has the meaning given that term in section 3313(b) of title 38, United States Code. ####
(2)The term “established charges”, with respect to a program of education, means the actual charges (as determined pursuant to regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs on the basis of a full academic year) for tuition and fees which similarly circumstanced nonveterans enrolled in the program of education would be required to pay. ####
(3)The term “institution of higher learning” has the meaning given that term in section 3452(f) of title 38, United States Code.
Connectionstraces to 1
2 references not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 111-377
  • 75 FR 66193
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 2
PRESERVATION OF HIGHER RATES FOR TUITION AND FEES FOR PROGRAMS OF EDUCATION AT NON-PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER LEARNING PURSUED BY INDIVIDUALS ENROLLED IN SUCH PROGRAMS PRIOR TO CHANGE IN MAXIMUM AMOUNT
Pub. L.Pub. L. 111-377
Fed. Reg.75 FR 66193
Cites 3Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.