Sec. 601. APPLICABILITY OF CONSENT DECREES AND OTHER LAW

800 words·~4 min read·/statute-compilations/comps-959/sec-601

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

## SEC. 601 APPLICABILITY OF CONSENT DECREES AND OTHER LAW **[**[47 U.S.C. 152](/us/usc/t47/s152) nt**]** ###

(a)Applicability of Amendments to Future Conduct ####

(1)AT&T consent decree Any conduct or activity that was, before the date of enactment of this Act, subject to any restriction or obligation imposed by the AT&T Consent Decree shall, on and after such date, be subject to the restrictions and obligations imposed by the Communications Act of 1934 as amended by this Act and shall not be subject to the restrictions and the obligations imposed by such Consent Decree. ####

(2)GTE consent decree Any conduct or activity that was, before the date of enactment of this Act, subject to any restriction or obligation imposed by the GTE Consent Decree shall, on and after such date, be subject to the restrictions and obligations imposed by the Communications Act of 1934 as amended by this Act and shall not be subject to the restrictions and the obligations imposed by such Consent Decree. ####

(3)McCaw consent decree Any conduct or activity that was, before the date of enactment of this Act, subject to any restriction or obligation imposed by the McCaw Consent Decree shall, on and after such date, be subject to the restrictions and obligations imposed by the Communications Act of 1934 as amended by this Act and subsection

(d)of this section and shall not be subject to the restrictions and the obligations imposed by such Consent Decree. ###

(b)Antitrust Laws ####

(1)Savings clause Except as provided in paragraphs

(2)and (3), nothing in this Act or the amendments made by this Act shall be construed to modify, impair, or supersede the applicability of any of the antitrust laws. ####

(2)Repeal Subsection

(a)of section 221 (47 U.S.C. 221(a)) is repealed. ####

(3)Clayton act Section 7 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 18) is amended in the last paragraph by striking “Federal Communications Commission,”. ###

(c)Federal, State, and Local Law ####

(1)No implied effect This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall not be construed to modify, impair, or supersede Federal, State, or local law unless expressly so provided in such Act or amendments. ####

(2)State tax savings provision Notwithstanding paragraph (1), nothing in this Act or the amendments made by this Act shall be construed to modify, impair, or supersede, or authorize the modification, impairment, or supersession of, any State or local law pertaining to taxation, except as provided in sections 622 and 653(c) of the Communications Act of 1934 and section 602 of this Act. ###

(d)Commercial Mobile Service Joint Marketing Notwithstanding section 22.903 of the Commission's regulations (47 C.F.R. 22.903) or any other Commission regulation, a Bell operating company or any other company may, except as provided in sections 271(e)(1) and 272 of the Communications Act of 1934 as amended by this Act as they relate to wireline service, jointly market and sell commercial mobile services in conjunction with telephone exchange service, exchange access, intraLATA telecommunications service, interLATA telecommunications service, and information services. ###

(e)Definitions As used in this section: ####

(1)AT&T consent decree The term “**AT&T Consent Decree**” means the order entered August 24, 1982, in the antitrust action styled United States v. Western Electric, Civil Action No. 82–0192, in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and includes any judgment or order with respect to such action entered on or after August 24, 1982. ####

(2)GTE consent decree The term “**GTE Consent Decree**” means the order entered December 21, 1984, as restated January 11, 1985, in the action styled United States v. GTE Corp., Civil Action No. 83–1298, in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and any judgment or order with respect to such action entered on or after December 21, 1984. ####

(3)McCaw consent decree The term “**McCaw Consent Decree**” means the proposed consent decree filed on July 15, 1994, in the antitrust action styled United States v. AT&T Corp. and McCaw Cellular Communications, Inc., Civil Action No. 94–01555, in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Such term includes any stipulation that the parties will abide by the terms of such proposed consent decree until it is entered and any order entering such proposed consent decree. ####

(4)Antitrust laws The term “**antitrust laws**” has the meaning given it in subsection

(a)of the first section of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 12(a)), except that such term includes the Act of June 19, 1936 (49 Stat. 1526; 15 U.S.C. 13 et seq.), commonly known as the Robinson-Patman Act, and section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 45) to the extent that such section 5 applies to unfair methods of competition.

Connectionstraces to 6

Traces to 6 documents

U.S. Code