Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTE-COMPILATIONS · Water Resources Development Act of 2007 · Sec. 5055

Sec. 5055. UPPER CALAVERAS RIVER, STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA

171 words·~1 min read·/statute-compilations/comps-9003/sec-5055

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

## SEC. 5055 UPPER CALAVERAS RIVER, STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA ###
(a)Reevaluation The Secretary shall reevaluate the feasibility of the Lower Mosher Slough element and the levee extensions on the Upper Calaveras River element of the project for flood control, Stockton Metropolitan Area, California, carried out under section 211(f)(3) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3683), to determine the eligibility of such elements for reimbursement under section 211 of such Act (33 U.S.C. 701b–13). ###
(b)Special Rules for Reevaluation In conducting the reevaluation under subsection (a), the Secretary shall not reject a feasibility determination based on one or more of the policies of the Corps of Engineers concerning the frequency of flooding, the drainage area, and the amount of runoff. ###
(c)Reimbursement If the Secretary determines that the elements referred to subsection
(a)are feasible, the Secretary shall reimburse, subject to appropriations, the non-Federal interest under section 211 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 for the Federal share of the cost of such elements.
Connections2 off-index
2 references not yet in our index
  • 110 Stat. 3683
  • 33 USC 701b–13
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 5055
UPPER CALAVERAS RIVER, STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA
Stat.110 Stat. 3683
Cite33 USC 701b–13
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.