Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTE-COMPILATIONS · Toxic Substances Control Act · Sec. 213

Sec. 213. EPA STUDY OF ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIAL IN PUBLIC BUILDINGS

169 words·~1 min read·/statute-compilations/comps-895/sec-213

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

## SEC. 213 EPA STUDY OF ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIAL IN PUBLIC BUILDINGS Within 360 days after the date of the enactment of this title, the Administrator shall conduct and submit to the Congress the results of a study which shall— ####
(1)assess the extent to which asbestos-containing materials are present in public and commercial buildings; ####
(2)assess the condition of asbestos-containing material in commercial buildings and the likelihood that persons occupying such buildings, including service and maintenance personnel, are, or may be, exposed to asbestos fibers; ####
(3)consider and report on whether public and commercial buildings should be subject to the same inspection and response action requirements that apply to school buildings; ####
(4)assess whether existing Federal regulations adequately protect the general public, particularly abatement personnel, from exposure to asbestos during renovation and demolition of such buildings; and ####
(5)include recommendations that explicitly address whether there is a need to establish standards for, and regulate asbestos exposure in, public and commercial buildings. **[**[15 U.S.C. 2653](/us/usc/t15/s2653)**]**
Connectionstraces to 1
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 213
EPA STUDY OF ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIAL IN PUBLIC BUILDINGS
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.