Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTE-COMPILATIONS · Compilation 8791 · Sec. 2113

Sec. 2113. DETERMINATION OF ELIGIBILITY AND COMPENSATION

539 words·~2 min read·/statute-compilations/comps-8791/sec-2113

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

## Sec. 2113 DETERMINATION OF ELIGIBILITY AND COMPENSATION **[**300aa–13**]** ###
(a)General Rule ####
(1)Compensation shall be awarded under the Program to a petitioner if the special master or court finds on the record as a whole— #####
(A)that the petitioner has demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence the matters required in the petition by section 2111(c)(1), and #####
(B)that there is not a preponderance of the evidence that the illness, disability, injury, condition, or death described in the petition is due to factors unrelated to the administration of the vaccine described in the petition. The special master or court may not make such a finding based on the claims of a petitioner alone, unsubstantiated by medical records or by medical opinion. ####
(2)For purposes of paragraph (1), the term “**factors unrelated to the administration of the vaccine**”— #####
(A)does not include any idiopathic, unexplained, unknown, hypothetical, or undocumentable cause, factor, injury, illness, or condition, and #####
(B)may, as documented by the petitioner's evidence or other material in the record, include infection, toxins, trauma (including birth trauma and related anoxia), or metabolic disturbances which have no known relation to the vaccine involved, but which in the particular case are shown to have been the agent or agents principally responsible for causing the petitioner's illness, disability, injury, condition, or death. ###
(b)Matters To Be Considered ####
(1)In determining whether to award compensation to a petitioner under the Program, the special master or court shall consider, in addition to all other relevant medical and scientific evidence contained in the record— #####
(A)any diagnosis, conclusion, medical judgment, or autopsy or coroner's report which is contained in the record regarding the nature, causation, and aggravation of the petitioner's illness, disability, injury, condition, or death, and #####
(B)the results of any diagnostic or evaluative test which are contained in the record and the summaries and conclusions. Any such diagnosis, conclusion, judgment, test result, report, or summary shall not be binding on the special master or court. In evaluating the weight to be afforded to any such diagnosis, conclusion, judgment, test result, report, or summary, the special master or court shall consider the entire record and the course of the injury, disability, illness, or condition until the date of the judgment of the special master or court. ####
(2)The special master or court may find the first symptom or manifestation of onset or significant aggravation of an injury, disability, illness, condition, or death described in a petition occurred within the time period described in the Vaccine Injury Table even though the occurrence of such symptom or manifestation was not recorded or was incorrectly recorded as having occurred outside such period. Such a finding may be made only upon demonstration by a preponderance of the evidence that the onset or significant aggravation of the injury, disability, illness, condition, or death described in the petition did in fact occur within the time period described in the Vaccine Injury Table. ###
(c)Record Defined For purposes of this section, the term “**record**” means the record established by the special masters of the United States Claims Court in a proceeding on a petition filed under section 2111.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.