Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTE-COMPILATIONS · Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 · Sec. 4019

Sec. 4019. IN-LINE CHECKED BAGGAGE SCREENING

469 words·~2 min read·/statute-compilations/comps-8188/sec-4019

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

## SEC. 4019 IN-LINE CHECKED BAGGAGE SCREENING **[**[49 U.S.C. 44901 note](/us/usc/t49/s44901)**]** ###
(a)In-Line Baggage Screening Equipment The Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security (Transportation Security Administration) shall take such action as may be necessary to expedite the installation and use of in-line baggage screening equipment at airports at which screening is required by section 44901 of title 49, United States Code. ###
(b)Schedule Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Assistant Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a schedule to expedite the installation and use of in-line baggage screening equipment at such airports, with an estimate of the impact that such equipment, facility modification, and baggage conveyor placement will have on staffing needs and levels related to aviation security. ###
(c)Replacement of Trace-Detection Equipment Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Assistant Secretary shall establish and submit to the appropriate congressional committees a schedule for replacing trace-detection equipment, as soon as practicable and where appropriate, with explosive detection system equipment. ###
(d)Cost-Sharing Study The Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with representatives of air carriers, airport operators, and other interested parties, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees, in conjunction with the submission of the budget for fiscal year 2006 to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code— ####
(1)a proposed formula for cost-sharing among the Federal Government, State and local governments, and the private sector for projects to install in-line baggage screening equipment that reflects the benefits that each of such entities derive from such projects, including national security benefits and labor and other cost savings; ####
(2)recommendations, including recommended legislation, for an equitable, feasible, and expeditious system for defraying the costs of the in-line baggage screening equipment authorized by this title; and ####
(3)the results of a review of innovative financing approaches and possible cost savings associated with the installation of in-line baggage screening equipment at airports. ###
(e)Authorization for Expiring and New LOIs ####
(1)In general Section 44923(i) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by striking “$250,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2004 through 2007.” and inserting “$400,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2005, 2006, and 2007.”. ####
(2)Period of reimbursement Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary may provide that the period of reimbursement under any letter of intent may extend for a period not to exceed 10 years after the date that the Secretary issues such letter, subject to the availability of appropriations. This paragraph applies to letters of intent issued under section 44923 of title 49, United States Code, and letters of intent issued under section 367 of the Department of Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriation Act, 2003 (49 U.S.C. 47110 note).
Connectionstraces to 2
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 4019
IN-LINE CHECKED BAGGAGE SCREENING
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.