Sec. 433. nomination and appointment of judges
665 words·~3 min read·
/statute-compilations/comps-709/sec-433A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
## Sec. 433 nomination and appointment of judges ###
(a)Except as provided in section 434(d)(1), the President shall nominate, from the list of persons recommended to him by the District of Columbia Judicial Nomination Commission established under section 434, and, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, appoint all judges of the District of Columbia courts. ###
(b)No person may be nominated or appointed a judge of a District of Columbia court unless he— ####
(1)is a citizen of the United States; ####
(2)is an active member of the unified District of Columbia Bar and has been engaged in the active practice of law in the District for the five years immediately preceding his nomination or for such five years has been on the faculty of a law school in the District, or has been employed as a lawyer by the United States or the District of Columbia government; ####
(3)is a bona fide resident of the District of Columbia and has maintained an actual place of abode in the District for at least ninety days immediately prior to his nomination, and shall retain such residency as long as he serves as such judge, accept judges appointed prior to the effective date of this part who retain residency as required by section 1501(a) of title II of the District of Columbia Code shall not be required to be residents of the District to be eligible for reappointment or to serve any term to which reappointed; ####
(4)is recommended to the President, for such nomination and appointment, by the District of Columbia Judicial Nomination Commission; and ####
(5)has not served, within a period of two years prior to his nomination, as a member of the Tenure Commission or of the District of Columbia Judicial Nomination Commission. ###
(c)Not less than six months prior to the expiration of his term of office, any judge of the District of Columbia courts may file with the Tenure Commission a declaration of candidacy for reappointment. If a declaration is not so filed by any judge, a vacancy shall result from the expiration of his term of office and shall be filled by appointment as provided in subsections
(a)and (b). If a declaration is so filed, the Tenure Commission shall, not less than thirty9 days prior to the expiration of the declaring candidate's term of office, prepare and submit to the President a written evaluation of the declaring candidate's performance during his present term of office and his fitness for reappointment to another term. If the Tenure Commission determines the declaring candidate to be exceptionally well-qualified or10 well qualified for reappointment to another term, then the term of such declaring candidate shall be automatically extended for another full term, subject to mandatory retirement, suspension, or removal. If the Tenure Commission determines the declaring candidate to be qualified for reappointment to another term, then the President may nominate such candidate, in which case the President shall submit to the Senate for advice and consent the renomination of the declaring candidate as judge. If the President determines not to so nominate such declaring candidate, he shall nominate another candidate for such position only in accordance with the provisions of subsections
(a)and (b). If the Tenure Commission determines the declaring candidate to be unqualified for reappointment to another term, then the President shall not submit to the Senate for advice and consent the renomination of the declaring candidate as judge and such judge shall not be eligible for reappointment or appointment as a judge of a District of Columbia court. 9Public Law 99–573, §12(2), amended the second sentence of this subsection by striking “thirty” and inserting “sixty”. Impossible to execute; intent was probably to amend the third sentence of this subsection. 10Public Law 99–573, §13, amended the third sentence of this subsection by striking “exceptionally well-qualified or”. Impossible to execute; intent was probably to amend the fourth sentence of this subsection.