Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTE-COMPILATIONS · Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965 · Sec. 211

Sec. 211. USE OF FUNDS IN PROJECTS CONSTRUCTED UNDER PROJECTED COST

213 words·~1 min read·/statute-compilations/comps-331/sec-211

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

## SEC. 211 USE OF FUNDS IN PROJECTS CONSTRUCTED UNDER PROJECTED COST **[**[42 U.S.C. 3151](/us/usc/t42/s3151)**]** ###
(a)In General In the case of a grant to a recipient for a construction project under section 201 or 209, if the Secretary determines, before closeout of the project, that the cost of the project, based on the designs and specifications that were the basis of the grant, has decreased because of decreases in costs, the Secretary may approve, without further appropriation, the use of the excess funds (or a portion of the excess funds) by the recipient— ####
(1)to increase the Federal share of the cost of a project under this title to the maximum percentage allowable under section 204; or ####
(2)to improve the project. ###
(b)Other Uses of Excess Funds Any amount of excess funds remaining after application of subsection
(a)may be used by the Secretary for providing assistance under this Act. ###
(c)Transferred Funds In the case of excess funds described in subsection
(a)in projects using funds transferred from other Federal agencies pursuant to section 604, the Secretary shall— ####
(1)use the funds in accordance with subsection (a), with the approval of the originating agency; or ####
(2)return the funds to the originating agency.
Connectionstraces to 1
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 211
USE OF FUNDS IN PROJECTS CONSTRUCTED UNDER PROJECTED COST
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.