Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTE-COMPILATIONS · safeguard the consumer in connection with the utilization of credit by requiring full disclosure of the terms and conditions of finance charges in credit transactions or in offers to extend credit; by · Sec. 922

Sec. 922. Relation to State laws

310 words·~1 min read·/statute-compilations/comps-260/sec-922

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

## § 922 Relation to State laws **[**[15 U.S.C. 1693q](/us/usc/t15/s1693q)**]** This title does not annul, alter, or affect the laws of any State relating to electronic fund transfers,113 except to the extent that those laws are inconsistent with the provisions of this title, and then only to the extent of the inconsistency. A State law is not inconsistent with this title if the protection such law affords any consumer is greater than the protection afforded by this title. The Bureau shall, upon its own motion or upon the request of any financial institution, State, or other interested party, submitted in accordance with procedures prescribed in regulations of the Bureau, determine whether a State requirement is inconsistent or affords greater protection.
If the Bureau determines that a State requirement is inconsistent, financial institutions shall incur no liability under the law of the State for a good faith failure to comply with that law, notwithstanding that such determination is subsequently amended, rescinded, or determined by judicial or other authority to be invalid for any reason. This title does not extend the applicability of any such law to any class of persons or transactions to which it would not otherwise apply. 113Sections 919 through the end of the title reflect errors in redesignations as a result of amendments made by section 1073(a)(3) and
(4)and section 1075(a)(1) and
(2)of Public Law 111–203 and section 401 of Public Law 111–24. The amendment by section 402 of Public Law 111–24 (123 Stat. 1754) attempts to amend section 920 of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act (as redesignated) by inserting “dormancy fees, inactivity charges or fees, service fees, or expiration dates of gift certificates, store gift cards, or general-use prepaid cards,” after “electronic fund transfers,”. The amendment could not be carried out in light of multiple redesignations by section 1073(a) and 1075(a) of Public Law 111–203.
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
3 references not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 111-203
  • Pub. L. 111-24
  • 123 Stat. 1754
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 922
Relation to State laws
Pub. L.Pub. L. 111-203
Pub. L.Pub. L. 111-24
Stat.123 Stat. 1754
Cites 4Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.