Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTE-COMPILATIONS · Thomas R. Carper Water Resources Development Act of 2024 · Sec. 1311

Sec. 1311. SANTA ANA RIVER MAINSTEM, CALIFORNIA

431 words·~2 min read·/statute-compilations/comps-18105/sec-1311

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

## SEC. 1311 SANTA ANA RIVER MAINSTEM, CALIFORNIA ###
(a)Santa Ana Creek, Including Santiago Creek ####
(1)Modification The project for flood control, Santa Ana River Mainstem Project, including Santiago Creek, California, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4113; 101 Stat. 1329-111; 104 Stat. 4611; 110 Stat. 3713; 121 Stat. 1115), is modified to require the Secretary to treat construction of the Santiago Creek Channel as a separable element of the project. ####
(2)Prohibition The Secretary may not construct the Santiago Creek Channel unless such construction minimizes the impacts to existing trees in, or adjacent to, the Santiago Creek Channel. ####
(3)Rule of construction Nothing in this subsection shall affect the authorization for other portions of the project described in paragraph (1). ####
(4)Definitions In this subsection: #####
(A)Santiago creek channel The term “Santiago Creek Channel” means the portion of the project for flood control, Santa Ana River Mainstem Project, including Santiago Creek, California, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4113; 101 Stat. 1329-111; 104 Stat. 4611; 110 Stat. 3713; 121 Stat. 1115), consisting of Santiago Creek downstream of the I-5 Interstate Highway to the confluence with the Santa Ana River. #####
(B)Separable element The term “separable element” has the meaning given such term in section 103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213). ###
(b)Report ####
(1)In general Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall provide the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate with an update on implementation of the project for flood control, Santa Ana River Mainstem, including Santiago Creek, California, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4113; 101 Stat. 1329-111; 104 Stat. 4611; 110 Stat. 3713; 121 Stat. 1115). ####
(2)Specifications In providing the update required under paragraph (1), the Secretary is directed to provide specific information on— #####
(A)efforts by the Secretary and the non-Federal interest for the project to acquire the lands or interests in lands necessary to implement the project; #####
(B)the status of potential reimbursement requests by the non-Federal interest for such lands or interests; and #####
(C)the status of ongoing requests by the non-Federal interest for approval by the Secretary of pending land (or interest in land) appraisals and litigation settlements associated with such lands or interests in lands.
Connectionstraces to 2
4 references not yet in our index
  • 100 Stat. 4113
  • 104 Stat. 4611
  • 110 Stat. 3713
  • 121 Stat. 1115
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 1311
SANTA ANA RIVER MAINSTEM, CALIFORNIA
Stat.100 Stat. 4113
Stat.104 Stat. 4611
Stat.110 Stat. 3713
Stat.121 Stat. 1115
Cites 6Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.