Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTE-COMPILATIONS · National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024 · Sec. 533

Sec. 533. SUPREME COURT REVIEW OF CERTAIN ACTIONS OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES

492 words·~2 min read·/statute-compilations/comps-17632/sec-533

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

## SEC. 533 SUPREME COURT REVIEW OF CERTAIN ACTIONS OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES ###
(a)Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces ####
(1)In general Section 1259 of title 28, United States Code, is amended— #####
(A)in paragraph (3), by inserting “or refused to grant” after “granted”; and #####
(B)in paragraph (4), by inserting “or refused to grant” after “granted”. ####
(2)Technical and conforming amendments #####
(A)Title 10 Section 867a(a) of title 10, United States Code (article 67a of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended by striking “The Supreme Court may not review by a writ of certiorari under this section any action of the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces in refusing to grant a petition for review.”. #####
(B)Time for application for writ of certiorari Subsection
(g)of section 2101 of title 28, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: > > ### “(g) > > The time for application for a writ of certiorari to review a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, or the decision of a Court of Criminal Appeals that the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces refuses to grant a petition to review, shall be as prescribed by rules of the Supreme Court*.”* > . ###
(b)Effective Date and Applicability **[**[10 U.S.C. 867a note](/us/usc/t10/s867a)**]** ####
(1)In general The amendments made by subsection
(a)shall take effect on the date that is one year after the date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply with respect to any action of the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces in granting or refusing to grant a petition for review submitted to such Court for the first time on or after such effective date. ####
(2)Inapplicability to pending decisions With respect to a petition submitted to the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces before the effective date specified in paragraph
(1)and on which the Court has not taken action as of such date, the provisions of the United States Code amended by subsection
(a)shall apply as if such amendments had not been enacted. Any action of the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces in granting or refusing to grant such a petition is final and conclusive. ####
(3)Finality of decisions before effective date Any action of the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces in granting or refusing to grant a petition for review before the effective date specified in paragraph
(1)is final and conclusive. ####
(4)Rules required The Supreme Court shall prescribe rules to carry out section 2101(g) of title 28, United States Code, as amended by subsection (a)(2)(B) of this section, by not later than the effective date specified in paragraph (1).
Connectionstraces to 1
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 533
SUPREME COURT REVIEW OF CERTAIN ACTIONS OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.