Sec. 852. MODIFICATION TO MISCELLANEOUS LIMITATIONS ON THE PROCUREMENT OF GOODS OTHER THAN UNITED STATES GOODS

317 words·~1 min read·/statute-compilations/comps-17475/sec-852

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

## SEC. 852 MODIFICATION TO MISCELLANEOUS LIMITATIONS ON THE PROCUREMENT OF GOODS OTHER THAN UNITED STATES GOODS Section 4864 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 853, is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: > > ### “(l) Periodic Review > > > #### “(1) Recommendation > > Not later than November 1, 2024, and every five years thereafter, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment shall review each item described in subsections

(a)and

(e)of this section and submit to the congressional defense committees, in writing, one of the following recommendations: > > > ##### “(A) > > Recommend continued inclusion of the item under this section. > > > ##### “(B) > > Recommend continued inclusion of the item under this section with modifications. > > > ##### “(C) > > Recommend discontinuing inclusion of the item under this section. > > > #### “(2) Elements > > Each review required under paragraph

(1)shall include, with respect to the five-year period preceding the date of submission of the written determination related to such a review, the following elements: > > > ##### “(A) > > The criticality of the item reviewed to a military unit’s mission accomplishment or other national security objectives. > > > ##### “(B) > > The extent to which such item is fielded in current programs of record. > > > ##### “(C) > > The number of such items to be procured by current programs of record. > > > ##### “(D) > > The extent to which cost and pricing data for such item has been deemed fair and reasonable. > > > #### “(3) Justification > > The written determination required under paragraph

(1)shall also include the findings of the applicable review conducted under such paragraph and any key justifications for the recommendation.” > .