Sec. 8202. EXPEDITED COMPLETION

787 words·~4 min read·/statute-compilations/comps-17475/sec-8202

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

## SEC. 8202 EXPEDITED COMPLETION ###

(a)Feasibility Studies The Secretary shall expedite the completion of a feasibility study for each of the following projects, and if the Secretary determines that the project is justified in a completed report, may proceed directly to preconstruction planning, engineering, and design of the project: ####

(1)Modifications to the project for navigation, Auke Bay, Alaska. ####

(2)Project for flood risk management, Cave Buttes Dam, Arizona. ####

(3)Project for navigation, Branford Harbor and Stony Creek Channel, Connecticut. ####

(4)Project for flood risk management, East Hartford Levee System, Connecticut. ####

(5)Project for navigation, Guilford Harbor and Sluice Channel, Connecticut. ####

(6)Project for ecosystem restoration, Lake Okeechobee, Florida. ####

(7)Project for ecosystem restoration, Western Everglades, Florida. ####

(8)Modifications to the project for navigation, Hilo Harbor, Hawaii. ####

(9)Project for ecosystem restoration, Fox River, Illinois, included in the comprehensive plan under section 519 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2653). ####

(10)Project for ecosystem restoration, recreation, and other purposes, Illinois River, Chicago River, Calumet River, Grand Calumet River, Little Calumet River, and other waterways in the vicinity of Chicago, Illinois, authorized by section 201(a)(7) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (134 Stat. 2670). ####

(11)Project for hurricane and storm damage risk reduction, Chicago Shoreline, Illinois, authorized by section 101(a)(12) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3664; 128 Stat. 1372). ####

(12)Project for coastal storm risk management, St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana. ####

(13)Modifications to the project for navigation, Baltimore Harbor and Channels-Seagirt Loop Deepening, Maryland, including to a depth of 50 feet. ####

(14)Project for flood and coastal storm risk management and ecosystem restoration, Boston North Shore, Revere, Saugus, Lynn, Malden, and Everett, Massachusetts. ####

(15)Project for flood and coastal storm risk management, Chelsea, Massachusetts, authorized by a study resolution of the Committee on Public Works of the Senate dated September 12, 1969. ####

(16)Project for ecosystem restoration, Herring River Estuary, Barnstable County, Massachusetts, authorized by a resolution of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, approved July 23, 1997. ####

(17)Modifications to the project for flood risk management, North Adams, Massachusetts, authorized by section 5 of the Act of June 22, 1936 (chapter 688, 49 Stat. 1572; 55 Stat. 639), for flood risk management and ecosystem restoration. ####

(18)Project for coastal storm risk management, ecosystem restoration, and navigation, Nauset Barrier Beach and inlet system, Chatham, Massachusetts, authorized by a study resolution of the Committee on Public Works of the Senate dated September 12, 1969. ####

(19)Project for flood risk management, DeSoto County, Mississippi. ####

(20)Project for flood risk management, Rahway, New Jersey, authorized by section 336 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (134 Stat. 2712). ####

(21)Project for coastal storm risk management, Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, New Jersey. ####

(22)Project for coastal storm risk management, Sea Bright to Manasquan, New Jersey. ####

(23)Project for flood risk management, Rio Grande de Loiza, Puerto Rico. ####

(24)Project for flood risk management, Rio Nigua, Salinas, Puerto Rico. ####

(25)Project for flood risk management, Kanawha River Basin, West Virginia, Virginia, and North Carolina. ###

(b)Post-Authorization Change Reports The Secretary shall expedite completion of a post-authorization change report for the following projects: ####

(1)Project for ecosystem restoration, Tres Rios, Arizona, authorized by section 101(b)(4) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2577). ####

(2)Project for coastal storm risk management, Surf City and North Topsail Beach, North Carolina, authorized by section 7002(3) of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (128 Stat. 1367). ###

(c)Watershed and River Basin Assessments ####

(1)Great lakes coastal resiliency study The Secretary shall expedite the completion of the comprehensive assessment of water resources needs for the Great Lakes System under section 729 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2267a), as required by section 1219 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (132 Stat. 3811; 134 Stat. 2683). ####

(2)County of hawai‘i, hawaii The Secretary shall expedite the completion of a watershed assessment for the County of Hawai‘i, Hawaii, under section 729 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2267a). ###

(d)Maintenance of Navigation Channels The Secretary shall expedite the completion of a determination of the feasibility of improvements proposed by the non-Federal interest under section 204(f)(1)(A)(i) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2232(f)(1)(A)(i)), for the deepening and widening of the navigation project for Coos Bay, Oregon, authorized by the Act of March 3, 1879 (chapter 181, 20 Stat. 370).

Connectionstraces to 3

Traces to 3 documents

statutes-at-large