Sec. 8111. TRIBAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM
478 words·~2 min read·
/statute-compilations/comps-17475/sec-8111A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
## SEC. 8111 TRIBAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM Section 203 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2269) is amended— ####
(1)in subsection (a), by striking “(25 U.S.C. 450b)” and inserting “(25 U.S.C. 5304)”; ####
(2)in subsection (b)— #####
(A)in paragraph (2)— ######
(i)in subparagraph (A)— ######
(I)by inserting “hurricane and storm” after “flood”; and ######
(II)by inserting “including erosion control,” after “reduction,”; ######
(ii)in subparagraph (B), by striking “and” at the end; ######
(iii)by redesignating subparagraph
(C)as subparagraph (D); and ######
(iv)by inserting after subparagraph
(B)the following: > > ##### “(C) > > technical assistance to an Indian tribe, including— > > > ###### “(i) > > assistance for planning to ameliorate flood hazards, to avoid repetitive flood impacts, to anticipate, prepare, and adapt to changing hydrological and climatic conditions and extreme weather events, and to withstand, respond to, and recover rapidly from disruption due to flood hazards; and > > > ###### “(ii) > > the provision of, and integration into planning of, hydrologic, economic, and environmental data and analyses; and” > ; #####
(B)in paragraph (3), by adding at the end the following: > > ##### “(C) Initial costs > > The first $200,000 of the costs of a study under this section shall be at Federal expense.” > ; #####
(C)in paragraph (4)— ######
(i)in subparagraph (A), by striking “$18,500,000” and inserting “$26,000,000”; and ######
(ii)in subparagraph (B), by striking “$18,500,000” and inserting “$26,000,000”; and #####
(D)by adding at the end the following: > > #### “(5) Project justification > > Notwithstanding any requirement for economic justification established under section 209 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962-2), the Secretary may implement a project (other than a project for ecosystem restoration) under this section if the Secretary determines that the project will— > > > ##### “(A) > > significantly reduce potential flood or hurricane and storm damage hazards (which may be limited to hazards that may be addressed by measures for erosion mitigation or bank stabilization); > > > ##### “(B) > > improve the quality of the environment; > > > ##### “(C) > > reduce risks to life safety associated with the hazards described in subparagraph (A); and > > > ##### “(D) > > improve the long-term viability of the community.” > ; ####
(3)in subsection (d)— #####
(A)in paragraph (5)(B)— ######
(i)by striking “non-Federal” and inserting “Federal”; and ######
(ii)by striking “50 percent” and inserting “100 percent”; and #####
(B)by adding at the end the following: > > #### “(6) Technical assistance > > The Federal share of the cost of activities described in subsection (b)(2)(C) shall be 100 percent.” > ; and ####
(4)in subsection (e), by striking “2024” and inserting “2033”.
Connectionstraces to 4
Traces to 4 documents
Citation graph
cites case law
Cites 4Cited by 0 across 0 sources