Sec. 911. ALIGNMENT OF CLOSE COMBAT LETHALITY TASK FORCE

307 words·~1 min read·/statute-compilations/comps-16861/sec-911

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

## SEC. 911 ALIGNMENT OF CLOSE COMBAT LETHALITY TASK FORCE ###

(a)In General Beginning not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and continuing until the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees the report described in subsection (b), the Secretary shall reinstate— ####

(1)the initial alignment of the Close Combat Lethality Task Force so that the Task Force reports directly to the Secretary; and ####

(2)the designation of the Task Force as a cross-functional team under section 911 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114-328; 10 U.S.C. 111 note). ###

(b)Report Described The report described in this subsection is a report on a proposed alternative alignment for the Close Combat Lethality Task Force that includes— ####

(1)a description of— #####

(A)how the proposed alternative alignment of the Task Force would— ######

(i)facilitate the effective pursuit of, and support for, both materiel and non-materiel initiatives by the Task Force; ######

(ii)maintain benefits for the Task Force similar to the benefits associated with reporting directly to the Secretary of Defense and designation as a cross-functional team; and ######

(iii)ensure collaboration and support from the primary stakeholders in the Task Force, including the Army, the Marine Corps, and the United States Special Operations Command; and #####

(B)how the Task Force would be funded and gain appropriate resourcing for cross-functional team initiatives supported by the Secretary; and ####

(2)supporting analysis for the matters described in paragraph (1). ###

(c)Exception Subsection

(a)does not apply if the President submits to the congressional defense committees— ####

(1)a certification that implementing that subsection would be detrimental to the defense interests of the United States; and ####

(2)a justification for the certification.

Connectionstraces to 2

Traces to 2 documents

public-private-law