Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTE-COMPILATIONS · National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 · Sec. 162

Sec. 162. RELIEF FROM CONTRACTORS FOR FAILURE TO DELIVER READY-FOR-ISSUE SPARE PARTS FOR THE F-35 AIRCRAFT PROGRAM

200 words·~1 min read·/statute-compilations/comps-15772/sec-162

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

## SEC. 162 RELIEF FROM CONTRACTORS FOR FAILURE TO DELIVER READY-FOR-ISSUE SPARE PARTS FOR THE F-35 AIRCRAFT PROGRAM ###
(a)Requirement to Seek Relief Consistent with the findings and recommendations of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense in the report titled “Audit of F-35 Ready-For-Issue Spare Parts and Sustainment Performance Incentive Fees” (DODIG-2019-094) and dated June 13, 2019, the Secretary of Defense shall seek relief, as described in subsection (b), from prime contractors that delivered noncompliant ready-for-issue spare parts pursuant a contract under the F-35 aircraft program. ###
(b)Relief Described The relief sought by the Secretary of Defense under subsection
(a)may include the following: ####
(1)Specific performance. ####
(2)Compensation for costs incurred by the Department of Defense as a result of the contractor’s failure to deliver compliant ready-for-issue spare parts under the contract. ####
(3)Any other form of remediation or compensation the Secretary determines to be appropriate. ###
(c)Rule of Construction Nothing in this section shall be construed— ####
(1)to alter the terms of a contract under the F-35 aircraft program; or ####
(2)to authorize the Secretary of Defense to seek forms of relief beyond those otherwise available under law.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.