Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTE-COMPILATIONS · National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 · Sec. 1051

Sec. 1051. SCHEDULING OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EXECUTIVE AIRCRAFT CONTROLLED BY SECRETARIES OF MILITARY DEPARTMENTS

466 words·~2 min read·/statute-compilations/comps-15772/sec-1051

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

## SEC. 1051 SCHEDULING OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EXECUTIVE AIRCRAFT CONTROLLED BY SECRETARIES OF MILITARY DEPARTMENTS ###
(a)In General Chapter 2 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section: > > ## “SEC. 120 Department of Defense executive aircraft controlled by Secretaries of military departments > > **[**[10 U.S.C. 120](/us/usc/t10/s120)**]** > > > ### “(a) In General > > The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the Chief of the Air Force Special Air Mission Office is given the responsibility for coordination of scheduling all Department of Defense executive aircraft controlled by the Secretaries of the military departments in order to support required use travelers. > > > ### “(b) Responsibilities > > > ####
(1)> > Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this section, the Secretary of each of the military departments shall execute a memorandum of understanding with the Air Force Special Air Mission Office regarding oversight and management of executive aircraft controlled by that military department. > > > #### “(2) > > The Secretary of Defense shall be responsible for prioritizing travel when requests exceed available executive airlift capability. > > > #### “(3) > > The Secretary of a military department shall maintain overall authority for scheduling the required use travelers of that military department on executive aircraft controlled by the Secretary. When an executive aircraft controlled by the Secretary of a military department is not supporting required use travelers of that military department, the Secretary of the military department shall make such executive aircraft available for scheduling of other required use travelers. > > > ### “(c) Limitations > > > ####
(1)> > The Secretary of Defense may not establish a new command and control organization to support aircraft. > > > #### “(2) > > No executive aircraft controlled by the Secretary of a military department may be permanently stationed at any location without a required use traveler without the approval of the Secretary of Defense. > > > ### “(d) Definitions > > In this section: > > > #### “(1) > > The term ‘required use traveler’ has the meaning given such term in Department of Defense directive 4500.56, as in effect on the date of the enactment of this section. > > > #### “(2) > > The term ‘executive aircraft’ has the meaning given such term in Department of Defense directive 4500.43, as in effect on the date of the enactment of this section.” > . ###
(b)Clerical Amendment **[**[10 U.S.C. 111](/us/usc/t10/s111)**]** The table of sections at the beginning of such chapteris amended by adding at the end the following new item:" “120. Department of Defense executive aircraft controlled by Secretaries of military departments.” ".
Connectionstraces to 2
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 1051
SCHEDULING OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EXECUTIVE AIRCRAFT CONTROLLED BY SECRETARIES OF MILITARY DEPARTMENTS
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.