Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTE-COMPILATIONS · Pallone-Thune Telephone Robocall Abuse Criminal Enforcement and Deterrence Act · Sec. 11

Sec. 11. PROVISION OF EVIDENCE OF CERTAIN ROBOCALL VIOLATIONS TO ATTORNEY GENERAL

280 words·~1 min read·/statute-compilations/comps-15628/sec-11

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

## SEC. 11 PROVISION OF EVIDENCE OF CERTAIN ROBOCALL VIOLATIONS TO ATTORNEY GENERAL **[**[47 U.S.C. 227b-2](/us/usc/t47/s227b-2)**]** ###
(a)In General If the Chief of the Enforcement Bureau of the Commission obtains evidence that suggests a willful, knowing, and repeated robocall violation with an intent to defraud, cause harm, or wrongfully obtain anything of value, the Chief of the Enforcement Bureau shall provide such evidence to the Attorney General. ###
(b)Report to Congress Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Commission shall publish on its website and submit to the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report that— ####
(1)states the number of instances during the preceding year in which the Chief of the Enforcement Bureau provided the evidence described in subsection
(a)to the Attorney General; and ####
(2)contains a general summary of the types of robocall violations to which such evidence relates. ###
(c)Rules of Construction Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect the ability of the Commission or the Chief of the Enforcement Bureau under other law— ####
(1)to refer a matter to the Attorney General; or ####
(2)to pursue or continue pursuit of an enforcement action in a matter with respect to which the Chief of the Enforcement Bureau provided the evidence described in subsection
(a)to the Attorney General. ###
(d)Robocall Violation Defined In this section, the term “robocall violation” means a violation of subsection
(b)or
(e)of section 227 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 227).
Connectionstraces to 2
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 11
PROVISION OF EVIDENCE OF CERTAIN ROBOCALL VIOLATIONS TO ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.