Sec. 3131. MODIFICATIONS TO COST-BENEFIT ANALYSES FOR COMPETITION OF MANAGEMENT AND OPERATING CONTRACTS
1,126 words·~5 min read·
/statute-compilations/comps-15483/sec-3131A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
## SEC. 3131 MODIFICATIONS TO COST-BENEFIT ANALYSES FOR COMPETITION OF MANAGEMENT AND OPERATING CONTRACTS ###
(a)In General Subtitle A of title XLVIII of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2781 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section: > > ## “SEC. SEC. 4807 COST-BENEFIT ANALYSES FOR COMPETITION OF MANAGEMENT AND OPERATING CONTRACTS > > **[**[50 U.S.C. 2787](/us/usc/t50/s2787)**]** > > > ### “(a) Briefings on Requests for Proposals > > Not later than 7 days after issuing a request for proposals for a contract to manage and operate a facility of the Administration, the Administrator shall brief the congressional defense committees on the preliminary assessment of the Administrator of the costs and benefits of the competition for the contract, including a preliminary assessment of the matters described in subsection
(c)with respect to the contract. > > > ### “(b) Reports After Transition to New Contracts > > If the Administrator awards a new contract to manage and operate a facility of the Administration, the Administrator shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes the matters described in subsection
(c)with respect to the contract by not later than 30 days after the completion of the period required to transition to the contract. > > > ### “(c) Matters Described > > The matters described in this subsection, with respect to a contract, are the following: > > > #### “(1) > > A clear and complete description of the cost savings the Administrator expects to result from the competition for the contract over the life of the contract, including associated analyses, assumptions, and information sources used to determine such expected cost savings. > > > #### “(2) > > A description of any key limitations or uncertainties that could affect such costs savings, including costs savings that are anticipated but not fully known. > > > #### “(3) > > The costs of the competition for the contract, including the immediate costs of conducting the competition, the costs of the transition to the contract from the previous contract, and any increased costs over the life of the contract. > > > #### “(4) > > A description of any disruptions or delays in mission activities or deliverables resulting from the competition for the contract. > > > #### “(5) > > A clear and complete description of the benefits expected by the Administrator with respect to mission performance or operations resulting from the competition. > > > #### “(6) > > How the competition for the contract complied with the Federal Acquisition Regulation regarding federally funded research and development centers, if applicable. > > > #### “(7) > > The factors considered and processes used by the Administrator to determine— > > > ##### “(A) > > whether to compete or extend the previous contract; and > > > ##### “(B) > > which activities at the facility should be covered under the contract rather than under a different contract. > > > #### “(8) > > With respect to the matters included under paragraphs
(1)through (7), a detailed description of the analyses conducted by the Administrator to reach the conclusions presented in the report, including any assumptions, limitations, and uncertainties relating to such conclusions. > > > #### “(9) > > Any other matters the Administrator considers appropriate. > > > ### “(d) Information Quality > > Each briefing required by subsection
(a)and report required by subsection
(b)shall be prepared in accordance with— > > > #### “(1) > > the information quality guidelines of the Department of Energy that are relevant to the clear and complete presentation of the matters described in subsection (c); and > > > #### “(2) > > best practices of the Government Accountability Office and relevant industries for cost estimating, if appropriate. > > > ### “(e) Review of Reports by Comptroller General of the United States > > > #### “(1) Initial review > > The Comptroller General of the United States shall provide a briefing to the congressional defense committees that includes a review of each report required by subsection
(b)not later than 180 days after the report is submitted to such committees. > > > #### “(2) Comprehensive review > > > ##### “(A) Determination > > The Comptroller General shall determine, in consultation with the congressional defense committees, whether to conduct a comprehensive review of a report required by subsection (b). > > > ##### “(B) Submission > > The Comptroller General shall submit a comprehensive review conducted under subparagraph
(A)of a report required by subsection
(b)to the congressional defense committees not later than 3 years after that report is submitted to such committees. > > > ##### “(C) Elements > > A comprehensive review conducted under subparagraph
(A)of a report required by subsection
(b)shall include an assessment, based on the most current information available, of the following: > > > ###### “(i) > > The actual cost savings achieved compared to cost savings estimated under subsection (c)(1), and any increased costs incurred under the contract that were unexpected or uncertain at the time the contract was awarded. > > > ###### “(ii) > > Any disruptions or delays in mission activities or deliverables resulting from the competition for the contract compared to the disruptions and delays estimated under subsection (c)(4). > > > ###### “(iii) > > Whether expected benefits of the competition with respect to mission performance or operations have been achieved. > > > ###### “(iv) > > Such other matters as the Comptroller General considers appropriate. > > > ### “(f) Applicability > > > #### “(1) In general > > The requirements for briefings under subsection
(a)and reports under subsection
(b)shall apply with respect to requests for proposals issued or contracts awarded, as applicable, by the Administrator during fiscal years 2019 through 2022. > > > #### “(2) Naval reactors > > The requirements for briefings under subsection
(a)and reports under subsection
(b)shall not apply with respect to a management and operations contract for a Naval Reactor facility.” > . ###
(b)Clerical Amendment The table of contents for the Atomic Energy Defense Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 4806 the following new item:" “Sec. 4807. Cost-benefit analyses for competition of management and operating contracts.” ". ###
(c)Termination of Superseded Provision Section 3121(e)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2175), as most recently amended by section 3135 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114-92; 129 Stat. 1207), is further amended by striking “2020” and inserting “2018”.
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
public-private-law
5 references not yet in our index
- 50 USC 2781
- 50 USC 2787
- Pub. L. 112-239
- 126 Stat. 2175
- 129 Stat. 1207
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 3131
MODIFICATIONS TO COST-BENEFIT ANALYSES FOR COMPETITION OF MANAGEMENT AND OPERATING CONTRACTS
Cite50 USC 2781
Cite50 USC 2787
Pub. L.Pub. L. 112-239
Stat.126 Stat. 2175
Stat.129 Stat. 1207
Cites 6Cited by 0 across 0 sources