Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTE-COMPILATIONS · John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 · Sec. 224

Sec. 224. CODIFICATION AND REAUTHORIZATION OF DEFENSE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT RAPID INNOVATION PROGRAM

792 words·~4 min read·/statute-compilations/comps-15483/sec-224

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

## SEC. 224 CODIFICATION AND REAUTHORIZATION OF DEFENSE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT RAPID INNOVATION PROGRAM ###
(a)Codification ####
(1)In general Chapter 139 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2359 the following new section: > > ## “SEC. 2359a Defense Research and Development Rapid Innovation Progra > > **[**[10 U.S.C. 2359a](/us/usc/t10/s2359a)**]** > > > ### “(a) Program Established > > > ####
(1)> > The Secretary of Defense shall establish a competitive, merit-based program to accelerate the fielding of technologies developed pursuant to phase II Small Business Innovation Research Program projects, technologies developed by the defense laboratories, and other innovative technologies (including dual use technologies). > > > #### “(2) > > The purpose of this program is to stimulate innovative technologies and reduce acquisition or lifecycle costs, address technical risks, improve the timeliness and thoroughness of test and evaluation outcomes, and rapidly insert such products directly in support of primarily major defense acquisition programs, but also other defense acquisition programs that meet critical national security needs. > > > ### “(b) Guidelines > > The Secretary shall issue guidelines for the operation of the program. At a minimum such guidance shall provide for the following: > > > #### “(1) > > The issuance of one or more broad agency announcements or the use of any other competitive or merit-based processes by the Department of Defense for candidate proposals in support of defense acquisition programs as described in subsection (a). > > > #### “(2) > > The review of candidate proposals by the Department of Defense and by each military department and the merit-based selection of the most promising cost-effective proposals for funding through contracts, cooperative agreements, and other transactions for the purposes of carrying out the program. > > > #### “(3) > > The total amount of funding provided to any project under the program from funding provided under subsection
(d)shall not exceed $3,000,000, unless the Secretary, or the Secretary’s designee, approves a larger amount of funding for the project. > > > #### “(4) > > No project shall receive more than a total of two years of funding under the program from funding provided under subsection (d), unless the Secretary, or the Secretary’s designee, approves funding for any additional year. > > > #### “(5) > > Mechanisms to facilitate transition of follow-on or current projects carried out under the program into defense acquisition programs, through the use of the authorities of section 2302e of this title or such other authorities as may be appropriate to conduct further testing, low rate production, or full rate production of technologies developed under the program. > > > #### “(6) > > Projects are selected using merit-based selection procedures and the selection of projects is not subject to undue influence by Congress or other Federal agencies. > > > ### “(c) Treatment Pursuant to Certain Congressional Rules > > Nothing in this section shall be interpreted to require or enable any official of the Department of Defense to provide funding under this section to any earmark as defined pursuant to House Rule XXI, clause 9, or any congressionally directed spending item as defined pursuant to Senate Rule XLIV, paragraph 5. > > > ### “(d) Funding > > Subject to the availability of appropriations for such purpose, the amounts authorized to be appropriated for research, development, test, and evaluation for a fiscal year may be used for such fiscal year for the program established under subsection (a). > > > ### “(e) Transfer Authority > > > ####
(1)> > The Secretary may transfer funds available for the program to the research, development, test, and evaluation accounts of a military department, defense agency, or the unified combatant command for special operations forces pursuant to a proposal, or any part of a proposal, that the Secretary determines would directly support the purposes of the program. > > > #### “(2) > > The transfer authority provided in this subsection is in addition to any other transfer authority available to the Department of Defense.” > . ####
(2)Clerical amendment **[**[10 U.S.C. 2351](/us/usc/t10/s2351)**]** The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 139 of such titleis amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2359 the following new item:" “2359a. Defense Research and Development Rapid Innovation Program.” ". ###
(b)Conforming Amendments ####
(1)Repeal of old provision Section 1073 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383; 10 U.S.C. 2359 note) is hereby repealed. ####
(2)Repeal of old table of contents item The table of contents in section 2(b) of such Act is amended by striking the item relating to section 1073.
Connectionstraces to 3
1 reference not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 111-383
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 224
CODIFICATION AND REAUTHORIZATION OF DEFENSE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT RAPID INNOVATION PROGRAM
Pub. L.Pub. L. 111-383
Cites 4Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.