Sec. 1626. FRAMEWORK ON GOVERNANCE, MISSION MANAGEMENT, RESOURCING, AND EFFECTIVE OVERSIGHT OF COMBAT SUPPORT AGENCIES THAT ARE ALSO ELEMENTS OF THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY
728 words·~3 min read·
/statute-compilations/comps-15483/sec-1626A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
## SEC. 1626 FRAMEWORK ON GOVERNANCE, MISSION MANAGEMENT, RESOURCING, AND EFFECTIVE OVERSIGHT OF COMBAT SUPPORT AGENCIES THAT ARE ALSO ELEMENTS OF THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY **[**[10 U.S.C. 193 note](/us/usc/t10/s193)**]** ###
(a)Framework Required ####
(1)In general In accordance with section 105 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3038), section 193 of title 10, United States Code, and section 1018 of the National Security Intelligence Reform Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-458; 50 U.S.C. 3023 note), the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Director of National Intelligence, shall develop and establish in policy a framework and supporting processes within the Department of Defense to help ensure that the missions, roles, and functions of the combat support agencies of the Department of Defense that are also elements of the intelligence community, and other intelligence components of the Department, are appropriately balanced and resourced. ####
(2)Scope The framework shall include a consistent, repeatable process for the evaluation of proposed additions, transfers, or eliminations of a mission, role, or functions and associated resource profiles of the elements described in paragraph
(1)for purposes of preventing imbalances in priorities, insufficient or misaligned resources, and the unauthorized expansion of mission parameters. ###
(b)Elements The framework required by subsection
(a)shall include the following: ####
(1)A lexicon of relevant terms used by the Department of Defense and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence that— #####
(A)ensures consistent definitions are used in determinations about the balance described in subsection (a)(1); and #####
(B)reconciles jointly used definitions. ####
(2)A reevaluation of the intelligence components of the Department, including the Joint Intelligence Centers and Joint Intelligence Operations Centers within the combatant commands, in order to determine which components should be formally designated as part of the intelligence community and any components not so designated conform to relevant tradecraft standards. ####
(3)A repeatable process of the Department for evaluating the addition, transfer, or elimination of defense intelligence missions, roles, and functions, currently or to be performed by elements described in subsection (a)(1) that includes— #####
(A)a justification for any proposed addition, transfer, or elimination of a mission, role, or function; #####
(B)the identification of the elements in the Federal Government, if any, that currently perform the mission, role, or function concerned; #####
(C)for any proposed addition of a mission, role, or function, an assessment of the most appropriate element of the Department to assume it, taking into account current resource profiles, scope of existing responsibilities, primary customers, and infrastructure necessary to support the addition; and #####
(D)for any proposed addition or transfer of a mission, role, or function— ######
(i)a determination of the appropriate resource profile for such mission, role, or function; and ######
(ii)the identification, in writing, for the Department elements concerned of the resources anticipated to be needed and source of such resources during the period covered by the future-years defense program submitted to Congress under section 221 of title 10, United States Code, as in effect at the time of the proposed addition or transfer. ###
(c)Briefing Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in coordination with the Director, shall provide to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate, and to any other appropriate congressional committee upon request, a briefing on the framework required by subsection (a). ###
(d)Policy Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in coordination with the Director, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report setting forth the policy establishing the framework required by subsection (a). ###
(e)Definitions In this section: ####
(1)The term “appropriate congressional committees” means— #####
(A)the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and #####
(B)the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives. ####
(2)The term “combat support agency” has the meaning given that term in section 193 of title 10, United States Code. ####
(3)The term “intelligence community” has the meaning given that term in section 3(4) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(4)). ## Subtitle C Cyberspace-Related Matters
Connectionstraces to 4
1 reference not yet in our index
- Pub. L. 108-458
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 1626
FRAMEWORK ON GOVERNANCE, MISSION MANAGEMENT, RESOURCING, AND EFFECTIVE OVERSIGHT OF COMBAT SUPPORT AGENCIES THAT ARE ALSO ELEMENTS OF THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY
Pub. L.Pub. L. 108-458
Cites 5Cited by 0 across 0 sources