Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTE-COMPILATIONS · John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 · Sec. 1624

Sec. 1624. DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE BUSINESS MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS

496 words·~2 min read·/statute-compilations/comps-15483/sec-1624

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

## SEC. 1624 DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE BUSINESS MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS **[**[10 U.S.C. 2222 note](/us/usc/t10/s2222)**]** ###
(a)Standardized Business Process Rules ####
(1)Development Not later than October 1, 2020, the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense, in coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) and the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence, shall develop and implement standardized business process rules for the planning, programming, budgeting, and execution process for the Military Intelligence Program. ####
(2)Treatment of data The Chief Management Officer shall develop the standardized business process rules under paragraph
(1)in accordance with section 911 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115-91; 131 Stat. 1519; 10 U.S.C. 2222 note) and section 2222(e)(6) of title 10, United States Code. ####
(3)Use of existing systems In developing the standardized business process rules under paragraph (1), to the extent practicable, the Chief Management Officer shall use enterprise business systems of the Department of Defense in existence as of the date of the enactment of this Act. ####
(4)Report Not later than March 1, 2019, the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense, the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), and the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence shall jointly submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report containing a plan to develop the standardized business process rules under paragraph (1). ####
(5)Appropriate congressional committees In this subsection, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means the following: #####
(A)The congressional defense committees. #####
(B)The Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate. ###
(b)Program Elements ####
(1)In general Chapter 9 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section: > > ## “SEC. 239b Certain intelligence-related programs: budget justification material > > **[**[10 U.S.C. 239b](/us/usc/t10/s239b)**]** > > > ### “(a) Prohibition on Use of Program Elements > > In the budget justification materials submitted to Congress in support of the Department of Defense budget for fiscal year 2021 and each fiscal year thereafter (as submitted with the budget of the President under section 1105(a) of title 31), the Secretary of Defense may not include in any single program element both funds made available under the Military Intelligence Program and funds made available outside of the Military Intelligence Program. > > > ### “(b) Definitions > > In this section: > > > #### “(1) > > The term ‘budget’ has the meaning given that term in section 231(f) of this title. > > > #### “(2) > > The term ‘defense budget materials’ has the meaning given that term in section 231(f) of this title.” > . ####
(2)Clerical amendment **[**[10 U.S.C. 221](/us/usc/t10/s221)**]** The table of sections at the beginning of such chapteris amended by inserting after the item relating to section 239a the following new item:" “239b. Certain intelligence-related programs: budget justification materials.” ".
Connectionstraces to 4
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.