Sec. 3030. PROJECTS FOR NEW FIXED GUIDEWAY SYSTEMS AND EXTENSIONS TO EXISTING SYSTEMS
2,402 words·~11 min read·
/statute-compilations/comps-1431/sec-3030A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
## SEC. 3030 PROJECTS FOR NEW FIXED GUIDEWAY SYSTEMS AND EXTENSIONS TO EXISTING SYSTEMS ###
(a)Final Design and Construction The following projects are authorized for final design and construction for fiscal years 1998 through 2004 and for the period of October 1, 2004, through July 30, 2005, under section 5309(m)(1)(B) of title 49, United States Code: ####
(1)Atlanta—Athens Commuter Rail. ####
(2)Atlanta—Griffin Commuter Rail. ####
(3)Atlanta—North Line Extension. ####
(4)Austin—NW/North Central/SE—Airport LRT. ####
(5)Baltimore—Central LRT Extension to Glen Burnie. ####
(6)Boston—Massport Airport Intermodal Transit Connector. ####
(7)Boston—North Shore Corridor and Blue Line Extension to Beverly. ####
(8)Charlotte—North-South Corridor Transitway. ####
(9)Chicago—Navy Pier-McCormick Place Busway. ####
(10)Chicago—North Central Upgrade Commuter Rail. ####
(11)Chicago—Ravenswood Line Extension. ####
(12)Chicago—Southwest Extension. ####
(13)Chicago—West Line Expansion. ####
(14)Cleveland—Akron-Canton Commuter Rail. ####
(15)Cleveland—Berea Metroline Extension. ####
(16)Cleveland—Blue Line Extension. ####
(17)Cleveland—Euclid Corridor Extension. ####
(18)Cleveland—I–90 Corridor to Ashtabula County. ####
(19)Cleveland—Waterfront Line Extension. ####
(20)Dallas—North Central Extension. ####
(21)Dallas—Ft. Worth RAILTRAN (Phase II). ####
(22)Denver—East Corridor (Airport). ####
(23)Denver—Southeast LRT (I–25 between 6th & Lincoln). ####
(24)Denver—Southwest LRT. ####
(25)Denver—West Corridor LRT. ####
(26)East St. Louis-St. Clair County—Mid-America Airport Corridor. ####
(27)Ft. Lauderdale-West Palm Beach-Miami Tri-County Commuter Rail. ####
(28)Galveston—Trolley Extension. ####
(29)Hartford—Griffin Line. ####
(30)Hollis—Ketchikan Ferry. ####
(31)Houston—Regional Bus Plan—Phase I. ####
(32)Kansas City—I–35 Commuter Rail. ####
(33)Kansas City—Southtown Corridor. ####
(34)Kenosha-Racine—Milwaukee Rail Extension. ####
(35)Las Vegas Corridor. ####
(36)Little Rock—River Rail. ####
(37)Los Angeles—Metrolink San Bernadino Line. ####
(38)Los Angeles—MOS–3. ####
(39)Los Angeles—Metrolink (Union Station-Fullerton). ####
(40)Louisville—Jefferson County Corridor. ####
(41)MARC—Commuter Rail Improvements. ####
(42)Baltimore Light Rail Double Track. ####
(43)Memphis—Medical Center Extension. ####
(44)Miami—East-West Multimodal Corridor. ####
(45)Miami—North 27th Avenue Corridor. ####
(46)Miami—South Busway Extension. ####
(47)Milwaukee—East-West Corridor. ####
(48)Monterey County Commuter Rail. ####
(49)Nashua, NH—Lowell, MA Commuter Rail. ####
(50)Nashville—Commuter Rail. ####
(51)New Orleans—Canal Streetcar. ####
(52)New York—8th Avenue Subway Connector. ####
(53)New York—Brooklyn—Staten Island Ferry. ####
(54)New York—Long Island Railroad East Side Access. ####
(55)New York—Staten Island Ferry—Whitehall Intermodal Terminal. ####
(56)New York Susquehanna and Western Commuter Rail. ####
(57)New Jersey Urban Core. ####
(58)Norfolk—Virginia Beach Corridor. ####
(59)Orange County—Fullerton—Irvine Corridor. ####
(60)Orlando—I–4 Central Florida Light Rail System. ####
(61)Philadelphia—Schuykill Valley Metro. ####
(62)Phoenix—Fixed Guideway. ####
(63)Colorado—Roaring Fork Valley Rail. ####
(64)Pittsburgh Airborne Shuttle System. ####
(65)Pittsburgh—MLK Busway Extension. ####
(66)Portland—South-North Corridor. ####
(67)Portland—Westside-Hillsboro Corridor. ####
(68)Raleigh-Durham—Regional Transit Plan. ####
(69)Sacramento—Folsom Extension. ####
(70)Sacramento—Placer County Corridor. ####
(71)Sacramento—South Corridor. ####
(72)Salt Lake City—Light Rail (Airport to University of Utah). ####
(73)Salt Lake City—Ogden-Provo Commuter Rail. ####
(74)Salt Lake City—South LRT. ####
(75)San Diego—Mid-Coast LRT Corridor. ####
(76)San Diego—Mission Valley East Corridor. ####
(77)San Diego—Oceanside—Escondido Corridor. ####
(78)San Francisco—BART to San Francisco International Airport Extension. ####
(79)San Francisco—Bayshore Corridor. ####
(80)San Jose—Tasman Corridor Light Rail. ####
(81)San Juan—Tren Urbano. ####
(82)San Juan—Tren Urbano Extension to Minellas. ####
(83)Santa Cruz—Fixed Guideway. ####
(84)Seattle—Southworth High Speed Ferry. ####
(85)Seattle—Sound Move Corridor. ####
(86)South Boston—Piers Transitway. ####
(87)St. Louis—Cross County Corridor. ####
(88)Stockton—Altamont Commuter Rail. ####
(89)Tampa Bay—Regional Rail. ####
(90)Twin Cities—Northstar Corridor (Downtown Minneapolis-Anoka County-St. Cloud). ####
(91)Twin Cities—Transitways Corridors. ####
(92)Washington—Richmond Rail Corridor Improvements. ####
(93)Washington, D.C.—Dulles Corridor Extension. ####
(94)Washington, D.C.—Largo Extension. ####
(95)West Trenton Line (West Trenton-Newark). ####
(96)Westlake—Commuter Rail Link. ####
(97)Pittsburgh North Shore-Central Business District Corridor. ####
(98)Pittsburgh—Stage II Light Rail. ####
(99)Boston—North-South Rail Link. ####
(100)Spokane—South Valley Corridor Light Rail. ####
(101)Miami—Palmetto Metrorail. ####
(102)Morgantown—Personal Rapid Transit. ####
(103)Santa Monica—Boulevard transitway. ####
(104)Northwest New Jersey—Northeast Rail Corridor. ####
(105)Southeastern North Carolina Corridor. ####
(106)Chicago—CTA Douglas Branch. ####
(107)San Joaquin—Regional Transit Corridor. ####
(108)Greater Albuquerque Mass Transit Project. ####
(109)Hartford City Light Rail Connection to Central Business District. ####
(110)Providence–Boston Commuter Rail. ####
(111)New York–St. George's Ferry Intermodal Terminal. ####
(112)New York–Midtown West Ferry Terminal. ####
(113)Pinellas County–Mobility Initiative Project. ####
(114)Atlanta–MARTA Extension (S. De Kalb-Lindbergh). Washington County—Wilsonville to Beaverton commuter rail.1 1So in law. This item was added by section 322 of the Department of Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2002 (P.L. 107–87; 115 Stat. 859). The item probably should be designated as a new paragraph. ###
(b)Alternatives Analysis and Preliminary Engineering The following projects are authorized for alternatives analysis and preliminary engineering for fiscal years 1998 through 2004 and for the period of October 1, 2004, through July 30, 2005, under section 5309(m)(1)(B) of title 49, United States Code: ####
(1)Atlanta—Georgia 400 Multimodal Corridor. ####
(2)Sioux City–Light Rail. ####
(3)Atlanta—MARTA I–285 Transit Corridor. ####
(4)Atlanta—MARTA Marietta-Lawrenceville Corridor. ####
(5)Atlanta—MARTA South De Kalb Comprehensive Transit Program. ####
(6)Baltimore—Metropolitan Rail Corridor. ####
(7)Baltimore—People Mover. ####
(8)Bergen County Cross—County Light Rail. ####
(9)Birmingham Transit Corridor. ####
(10)Boston—Urban Ring. ####
(11)Charleston—Monobeam. ####
(12)Chicago—Comiskey Park Station. ####
(13)Chicago—Inner Circumferential Commuter Rail. ####
(14)Cumberland/Dauphin County Corridor 1 Commuter Rail. ####
(15)Dallas—DART LRT Extensions. ####
(16)Dallas—Las Colinas Corridor. ####
(17)Dayton—Regional Riverfront Corridor. ####
(18)El Paso—International Fixed Guideway (El Paso-Juarez). ####
(19)Fremont—South Bay Corridor. ####
(20)Houston—Advanced Transit Program. ####
(21)Jacksonville—Fixed Guideway Corridor. ####
(22)Knoxville—Electric Transit. ####
(23)Lorain—Cleveland Commuter Rail. ####
(24)Los Angeles—MOS–4 East Side Extension (II). ####
(25)Los Angeles—MOS–4 San Fernando Valley East-West. ####
(26)Los Angeles—LOSSAN (Del Mar-San Diego). ####
(27)Maine High Speed Ferry Service. ####
(28)Maryland Route 5 Corridor. ####
(29)Memphis—Regional Rail Plan. ####
(30)Miami—Kendall Corridor. ####
(31)Miami—Northeast Corridor. ####
(32)New Jersey Trans-Hudson Midtown Corridor. ####
(33)New Orleans—Airport—CBD Commuter Rail. ####
(34)New Orleans—Desire Streetcar. ####
(35)New York—Astoria—East Elmhurst Extension. ####
(36)New York—Broadway—Lafayette & Bleecker Street Transfer. ####
(37)New York—Brooklyn—Manhattan Access. ####
(38)New York—Lower Manhattan Access. ####
(39)New York—Manhattan East Side Link. ####
(40)Santa Fe–El Dorado Rail Link. ####
(41)New York—Nassau Hub. ####
(42)New York—North Shore Railroad. ####
(43)New York—Queens West Light Rail Link. ####
(44)Albuquerque–High Capacity Corridor. ####
(45)Newburgh—LRT System. ####
(46)North Front Range Corridor. ####
(47)Northeast Indianapolis Corridor. ####
(48)Oakland Airport—BART Connector. ####
(49)Providence—Pawtucket Corridor. ####
(50)Philadelphia—Broad Street Line Extension. ####
(51)Philadelphia—Cross County Metro. ####
(52)Philadelphia—Lower Marion Township. ####
(53)San Jacinto–Branch Line (Riverside County). ####
(54)Redlands—San Bernardino Transportation Corridor. ####
(55)Riverside—Perris Rail Passenger Service. ####
(56)Salt Lake City—Draper Light Rail Extension. ####
(57)Salt Lake City—West Jordan Light Rail Extension. ####
(58)San Francisco—CalTrain Extension to Hollister. ####
(59)Scranton—Laurel Line Intermodal Corridor. ####
(60)SEATAC—Personal Rapid Transit. ####
(61)Toledo—CBD to Zoo. ####
(62)Union Township Station (Raritan Valley Line). ####
(63)Washington County Corridor (Hastings-St. Paul). ####
(64)Washington, D.C.—Georgetown-Ft. Lincoln. ####
(65)Williamsburg—Newport News-Hampton LRT. ####
(66)Cincinnati/N. Kentucky—Northeast Corridor. ####
(67)Northeast Ohio—commuter rail. ####
(68)California—North Bay Commuter Rail. ####
(69)Chicago–Northwest Rail Transit Corridor. ####
(70)Vermont–Burlington-Essex Commuter Rail. #### (71)1 Dane County Corridor—East-West Madison Metropolitan Area. 1Margin so in law. ####
(72)Wilmington Downtown transit corridor. ####
(73)Honolulu Bus Rapid Transit project. Detroit, Michigan Metropolitan Airport rail project.2 2So in law. This item was added by section 323 of the Department of Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2002 (P.L. 107–87; 115 Stat. 859). The item probably should be designated as a new paragraph. ###
(c)Project Authorizations ####
(1)In general Of the total amount made available by or authorized under section 5338(b) of title 49, United States Code, to carry out section 5309(m)(1)(B) for fiscal years 1998 through 2004 and for the period of October 1, 2004, through July 30, 2005: #####
(A)$3,000,000,000 shall be available for the following projects (even if the project is not listed in subsection
(a)or (b)): ######
(i)Birmingham Transit Corridor, $87,500,000. ######
(ii)San Diego Mission Valley and Mid-Coast Corridor, $325,000,000. ######
(iii)Denver-Southeast LRT (I–25 between 6th and Lincoln), $10,000,000. ######
(iv)Colorado—Roaring Fork Valley Rail, $40,000,000. ######
(v)Hartford City Connection to Central Business District, $33,000,000. ######
(vi)Bridgeport—Intermodal Corridor, $34,000,000. ######
(vii)New London—Waterfront Access, $10,000,000. ######
(viii)Old Saybrook—Hartford Rail Extension, $10,000,000. ######
(ix)Stamford—Fixed Guideway Connector, $18,000,000. ######
(x)Orlando—I–4 Central Florida Light Rail System, $100,000,000. ######
(xi)Miami—Palmetto Metrorail, $8,000,000. ######
(xii)Tampa Bay—Regional Rail, $2,000,000. ######
(xiii)Fort Lauderdale—West Palm Beach—Miami Tri-County Commuter Rail, $20,000,000. ######
(xiv)Miami—East-West Multimodal Corridor, $20,000,000. ######
(xv)Chicago—CTA Douglas Branch, $315,000,000. ######
(xvi)Northeast Indianapolis Corridor, $10,000,000. ######
(xvii)Sioux City—Light Rail, $10,000,000. ###### (xviii) MARC—Commuter Rail Improvements, $185,000,000. ######
(xix)Baltimore—Light Rail Double Track, $120,000,000. ######
(xx)Boston—North Shore Corridor and Blue Line Extension to Beverly, $50,000,000. ######
(xxi)Twin Cities—Transitways Corridors, $120,000,000. ######
(xxii)Twin Cities—Northstar Corridor (Downtown Minneapolis—Anoka County—St. Cloud), $6,000,000. ###### (xxiii) Kansas City–I-35 Commuter Rail, $30,000,000. ######
(xxiv)Las Vegas Corridor, $155,000,000. ######
(xxv)New Jersey—Bergen County Cross County Light Rail, $5,000,000. ######
(xxvi)New Jersey—Trans Hudson Midtown Corridor, $5,000,000. ###### (xxvii) Santa Fe—Eldorado Rail Link, $10,000,000. ###### (xxviii) Albuquerque Alvarado Intermodal Center, $5,000,000. ######
(xxix)Greater Albuquerque Mass Transit Project, $90,000,000. ######
(xxx)New York—Long Island Railroad East Side Access, $353,000,000. ######
(xxxi)New York—Second Avenue Subway, $5,000,000. ###### (xxxii) New York—Staten Island Ferry-Whitehall Intermodal Terminal, $40,000,000. ###### (xxxiii) New York—St. George's Ferry Intermodal Terminal, $20,000,000. ###### (xxxiv) New York—Nassau Hub, $10,000,000. ######
(xxxv)New York–Midtown West Ferry Terminal, $16,300,000. ###### (xxxvi) Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Corridor, $65,000,000. ###### (xxxvii) Portland South—North Corridor, $25,000,000. ###### (xxxviii) Philadelphia—Schuylkill Valley Metro, $75,000,000. ###### (xxxix) Pittsburgh Stage II Light Rail, $100,200,000. ######
(xl)Philadelphia—Pittsburgh High Speed Rail, $10,000,000. ######
(xli)Cumberland/Dauphin County Corridor 1 Commuter Rail, $20,000,000. ######
(xlii)Pittsburgh North Shore—Central Business District, $20,000,000. ###### (xliii) Providence–Boston Commuter Rail, $10,000,000. ######
(xliv)Rhode Island Integrated Intermodal Transportation, $25,000,000. ######
(xlv)Dallas—North Central Extension, $188,000,000. ######
(xlvi)Dallas—Southeast Corridor, $20,000,000. ###### (xlvii) Dallas—Northwest Corridor, $12,000,000. ###### (xlviii) Washington, D.C., Dulles Corridor Extension, $86,000,000. ######
(xlix)Seattle—Tacoma Commuter Rail, $40,000,000. ######
(l)San Joaquin Regional Intermodal Corridor, $14,000,000. ######
(li)Dallas-Ft. Worth RAILTRAN (Phase-II), $12,000,000. #####
(B)The remainder shall be available for projects listed in subsections
(a)and (b). ####
(2)Additional amounts #####
(A)In general The total amount authorized in section 5338(h)(5) of title 49, United States Code, for fiscal years 1999 through 2003 shall be available for projects listed in subsections
(a)and (b). #####
(B)Priority for salt lake city olympics ######
(i)In general Of the amount authorized to be appropriated under section 5338(h)(5), $640,000,000 is authorized to be appropriated for the Salt Lake City Winter Olympic Games for the following projects: ######
(I)North/South Light Rail. ######
(II)Airport to University of Utah Light Rail. ######
(III)Intermodal Facilities. ######
(IV)Park and Ride Lots. ######
(V)Bus Acquisition. ######
(ii)Government share The Government share of the costs of projects assisted under this subparagraph shall not exceed 80 percent. For purposes of determining the nongovernmental share for projects authorized under this subparagraph, highway, aviation, and transit projects shall be considered to be a program of projects. ######
(iii)Use of funds Funds provided under this subparagraph shall be available for planning and capital assistance. ####
(3)High priority project The Long Island Rail Road East Side Access project shall be given priority consideration by the Secretary for funds made available under paragraph (1)(B). The project shall also be exempted from all requirements relating to criteria for grants and loans for fixed guideway systems under section 5309(e) of such title and from regulations required under that section. In addition, that project is authorized for construction with funds available under section 5338(h)(5) of title 49, United States Code. ###
(d)Effect of Authorization ####
(1)In general #####
(A)Subsection
(a)projects Projects authorized by subsection
(a)for final design and construction are also authorized for alternatives analysis and preliminary engineering. #####
(B)Subsection
(b)projects Effective October 1, 2000, projects authorized by subsection
(b)for alternatives analysis and preliminary engineering are also authorized for final design and construction. ####
(2)Fixed guideway authorization The project authorized by subsection (a)(3) includes an additional 28 rapid rail cars and project scope changes from amounts authorized by the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. ####
(3)Intermodal center authorizations Notwithstanding any other provision of law, each of the following projects are eligible for funding under section 5309(m)(1)(C) of title 49, United States Code: #####
(A)Huntington, West Virginia Intermodal Facility project. #####
(B)Huntsville Intermodal Center project. #####
(C)Saint Barnard Parish, Louisiana intermodal facility. #####
(D)Bethlehem, Pennsylvania intermodal facility. #####
(E)Alabama State Docks intermodal passenger and freight facility. #####
(F)Port of Anchorage Intermodal passenger and freight facility. #####
(G)Mobile Waterfront Terminal and Maritime Center of the Gulf. #####
(H)Memphis-Shelby International Airport intermodal facility. * * * * * * * ###
(f)Los Angeles MOS–3 Project ####
(1)In general For purposes of this section, the Los Angeles MOS–3 project referenced in subsection (a)(38) may include any fixed guideway project or projects selected by the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority for development in the transportation corridors to be served by the 3 extensions of MOS–3 of the Los Angeles County Metro Rail project, as described in section 3034(i) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. ####
(2)Alternatives In considering fixed guideway alternatives and selecting any revised preferred alternative in the East Side or Mid City corridors of MOS–3, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority shall— #####
(A)fully evaluate the potential impact of the alternatives on the integrity of the neighborhoods in the corridor involved; #####
(B)address the capacity of the alternatives to serve transit dependent riders; #####
(C)identify and address any disproportionately high and adverse effects on minority and low income populations, in accordance with the Executive Order on Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice (EO 12898; February 11, 1994); and #####
(D)otherwise comply with all applicable Federal and State planning and environmental requirements. * * * * * * *
Connections1 off-index
1 reference not yet in our index
- 115 Stat. 859
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 3030
PROJECTS FOR NEW FIXED GUIDEWAY SYSTEMS AND EXTENSIONS TO EXISTING SYSTEMS
Stat.115 Stat. 859
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources