Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTE-COMPILATIONS · Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century · Sec. 1110

Sec. 1110. CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

517 words·~2 min read·/statute-compilations/comps-1431/sec-1110

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

## SEC. 1110 CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM * * * * * * * ###
(d)Public-Private Partnerships ####
(1)In general * * * ####
(2)Determination by the secretary For the purposes of section 149(e) of title 23, United States Code, the Secretary shall determine in accordance with the procedures specified in section 149(b) of such title whether water-phased hydrocarbon fuel emulsion technologies that consist of a hydrocarbon base and water in an amount not less than 20 percent by volume reduce emissions of hydrocarbon, particulate matter, carbon monoxide, or nitrogen oxide from motor vehicles. ###
(e)Study of CMAQ Program ####
(1)In general The Secretary and the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall enter into arrangements with the National Academy of Sciences to complete, by not later than January 1, 2001, a study of the congestion mitigation and air quality improvement program under section 149 of title 23, United States Code. The study shall, at a minimum— #####
(A)evaluate the air quality impacts of emissions from motor vehicles; #####
(B)evaluate the negative effects of traffic congestion, including the economic effects of time lost due to congestion; #####
(C)determine the amount of funds obligated under the program and make a comprehensive analysis of the types of projects funded under the program; #####
(D)evaluate the emissions reductions attributable to projects of various types that have been funded under the program; #####
(E)assess the effectiveness, including the quantitative and nonquantitative benefits, of projects funded under the program and include, in the assessment, an estimate of the cost per ton of pollution reduction; #####
(F)assess the cost effectiveness of projects funded under the program with respect to congestion mitigation; #####
(G)compare— ######
(i)the costs of achieving the air pollutant emissions reductions achieved under the program; to ######
(ii)the costs that would be incurred if similar reductions were achieved by other measures, including pollution controls on stationary sources; #####
(H)include recommendations on improvements, including other types of projects, that will increase the overall effectiveness of the program; #####
(I)include recommendations on expanding the scope of the program to address traffic-related pollutants that, as of the date of the study, are not addressed by the program. ####
(2)Report Not later than January 1, 2000, the National Academy of Sciences shall transmit to the Secretary, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and the Committee on Commerce of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report on the results of the study with recommendations for modifications to the congestion mitigation and air quality improvement program in light of the results of the study. ####
(3)Funding Before making the apportionment of funds under section 104(b)(2) of title 23, United States Code, for each of fiscal years 1999 and 2000, the Secretary shall deduct from the amount to be apportioned under such section for such fiscal year, and make available, $500,000 for such fiscal year to carry out this subsection. * * * * * * *
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.