Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTE-COMPILATIONS · National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 · Sec. 818

Sec. 818. ENHANCED POST-AWARD DEBRIEFING RIGHTS

512 words·~2 min read·/statute-compilations/comps-13932/sec-818

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

## SEC. 818 ENHANCED POST-AWARD DEBRIEFING RIGHTS **[**[10 U.S.C. 2305 note](/us/usc/t10/s2305)**]** ###
(a)Release of Contract Award Information Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall revise the Department of Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation to require that all required post-award debriefings, while protecting the confidential and proprietary information of other offerors, include, at a minimum, the following: ####
(1)In the case of a contract award in excess of $100,000,000, a requirement for disclosure of the agency’s written source selection award determination, redacted to protect the confidential and proprietary information of other offerors for the contract award, and, in the case of a contract award in excess of $10,000,000 and not in excess of $100,000,000 with a small business or nontraditional contractor, an option for the small business or nontraditional contractor to request such disclosure. ####
(2)A requirement for a written or oral debriefing for all contract awards and task or delivery orders valued at $10,000,000 or higher. ####
(3)Provisions ensuring that both unsuccessful and winning offerors are entitled to the disclosure described in paragraph
(1)and the debriefing described in paragraph (2). ####
(4)Robust procedures, consistent with section 2305(b)(5)(D) of title 10, United States Code, and provisions implementing that section in the Federal Acquisition Regulation, to protect the confidential and proprietary information of other offerors. ###
(b)Opportunity for Follow-up Questions Section 2305(b)(5) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— ####
(1)by redesignating subparagraphs (C), (D), and
(E)as subparagraphs (D), (E), and (F), respectively; ####
(2)in subparagraph (B)— #####
(A)in clause (v), by striking “; and” and inserting a semicolon; #####
(B)in clause (vi), by striking the period at the end and inserting “; and”; and #####
(C)by adding at the end the following new clause: > > ###### “(vii) > > an opportunity for a disappointed offeror to submit, within two business days after receiving a post-award debriefing, additional questions related to the debriefing.” > ; and ####
(3)by inserting after subparagraph
(B)the following new subparagraph: > > ##### “(C) > > The agency shall respond in writing to any additional question submitted under subparagraph (B)(vii) within five business days after receipt of the question. The agency shall not consider the debriefing to be concluded until the agency delivers its written responses to the disappointed offeror.” > . ###
(c)Commencement of Post-briefing Period Section 3553(d)(4) of title 31, United States Code, is amended— ####
(1)by redesignating subparagraphs
(A)and
(B)as clauses
(i)and
(ii)respectively; ####
(2)by striking “The period” and inserting “(A) The period”; and ####
(3)by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: > > ##### “(B) > > For procurements conducted by any component of the Department of Defense, the 5-day period described in subparagraph (A)(ii) does not commence until the day the Government delivers to a disappointed offeror the written responses to any questions submitted pursuant to section 2305(b)(5)(B)(vii) of title 10.” > .
Connectionstraces to 1
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 818
ENHANCED POST-AWARD DEBRIEFING RIGHTS
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.