Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTE-COMPILATIONS · National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 · Sec. 136

Sec. 136. LIMITATION ON RETIREMENT OF U-2 AND RQ-4 AIRCRAFT

462 words·~2 min read·/statute-compilations/comps-13932/sec-136

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

## SEC. 136 LIMITATION ON RETIREMENT OF U-2 AND RQ-4 AIRCRAFT ###
(a)Limitation The Secretary of the Air Force may take no action that would prevent the Air Force from maintaining the fleets of U-2 aircraft or RQ-4 aircraft in their current, or improved, configurations and capabilities until— ####
(1)the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment certifies in writing to the appropriate committees of Congress that— #####
(A)in the case of the RQ-4 aircraft, the validated operating and sustainment costs of the capability developed to replace the RQ-4 aircraft are less than the validated operating and sustainment costs for the RQ-4 aircraft on a comparable flight-hour cost basis; or #####
(B)in the case of the U-2 aircraft, the validated operating and sustainment costs of the capability developed to replace the U-2 aircraft are less than the validated operating and sustainment costs for the U-2 aircraft on a comparable flight-hour cost basis; and ####
(2)the Chairman of the Joint Requirements Oversight Council certifies in writing to the appropriate committees of Congress that the capability to be fielded at the same time or before the retirement of the U-2 aircraft or RQ-4 aircraft (as the case may be) would result in equal or greater capability available to the commanders of the combatant commands and would not result in less capacity available to the commanders of the combatant commands. ###
(b)Waiver The Secretary of Defense may waive a certification requirement under paragraphs
(1)or
(2)of subsection
(a)with respect to U–2 aircraft or RQ–4 aircraft if the Secretary— ####
(1)with respect to the requirement under paragraph
(1)of that subsection— #####
(A)determines, after analyzing sufficient and relevant data, that a greater capability is worth increased operating and sustainment costs; and #####
(B)provides to the appropriate committees of Congress a certification on such determination and supporting analysis; and ####
(2)with respect to the requirement under paragraph
(2)of that subsection— #####
(A)determines, after analyzing sufficient and relevant data, that a loss in capacity and capability will not prevent the combatant commands from accomplishing their missions at acceptable levels of risk; and #####
(B)provides to the appropriate committees of Congress a certification of such determination and supporting analysis. ###
(c)Appropriate Committees of Congress Defined In this section, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” means— ####
(1)the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and ####
(2)the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives. ###
(d)Repeal Section 133 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81; 125 Stat. 1321) is repealed.
Connections2 off-index
2 references not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 112-81
  • 125 Stat. 1321
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 136
LIMITATION ON RETIREMENT OF U-2 AND RQ-4 AIRCRAFT
Pub. L.Pub. L. 112-81
Stat.125 Stat. 1321
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.