Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTE-COMPILATIONS · encourage the development of novel varieties of sexually reproduced plants and to make them available to the public, providing protection available to those who breed, develop, or discover them, and t · Sec. 122

Sec. 122. PRESUMPTION OF VALIDITY; DEFENSES

140 words·~1 min read·/statute-compilations/comps-13825/sec-122

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

## SEC. 122 PRESUMPTION OF VALIDITY; DEFENSES **[**[7 U.S.C. 2562](/us/usc/t7/s2562)**]** ###
(a)Certificates of plant variety protection shall be presumed valid. The burden of establishing invalidity of a plant variety protection shall rest on the party asserting invalidity. ###
(b)The following shall be defenses in any action charging infringement and shall be pleaded:
(1)noninfringement, absence of liability for infringement, or unenforceability;
(2)invalidity of the variety protection in suit on any ground specified in section 42 of this title as a condition for protectability;
(3)invalidity of the plant variety protection in suit for failure to comply with any requirement of section 52;
(4)that the asserted infringement was performed under an existing certificate adverse to that asserted and prior to notice of the infringement; and
(5)any other fact or act made a defense by this Act.
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 122
PRESUMPTION OF VALIDITY; DEFENSES
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.