Sec. 1401. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS
745 words·~3 min read·
/statute-compilations/comps-13821/sec-1401A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
## SEC. 1401 PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS The following projects for water resources development and conservation and other purposes, as identified in the reports titled “Report to Congress on Future Water Resources Development” submitted to Congress on January 29, 2015, and January 29, 2016, respectively, pursuant to section 7001 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d) or otherwise reviewed by Congress, are authorized to be carried out by the Secretary substantially in accordance with the plans, and subject to the conditions, described in the respective reports designated in this section: ####
(1)Navigation **A. State** **B. ** **Name** **C. ** **Date of ** Report of Chief of Engineers **D. ** **Estimated ** Costs1. TXBrazos Island Harbor Nov. 3, 2014Federal: $121,023,000Non-Federal: $89,453,000Total: $210,476,0002. LACalcasieu LockDec. 2, 2014Total: $17,432,000 (to be derived \1/2\ from the general fund of the Treasury and \1/2\ from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund)3. NH, MEPortsmouth Harbor and Piscataqua RiverFeb. 8, 2015Federal: $16,015,000Non-Federal: $5,338,000Total: $21,353,0004. FLPort EvergladesJun. 25, 2015Federal: $529,700,000Non-Federal: $247,209,000Total: $776,909,0005. AKLittle Diomede HarborAug. 10, 2015Federal: $26,394,000Non-Federal: $2,933,000Total: $29,327,0006. SCCharleston HarborSep. 8, 2015Federal: $231,239,000Non-Federal: $271,454,000Total: $502,693,0007. AKCraig HarborMar. 16, 2016Federal: $29,456,000Non-Federal: $3,299,000Total: $32,755,0008. PAUpper OhioSep. 12, 2016Total: $2,691,600,000 (to be derived \1/2\ from the general fund of the Treasury and \1/2\ from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund). ####
(2)Flood risk management **A. State** **B.** ** Name** **C. ** **Date of ** Report of Chief of Engineers **D. ** **Estimated ** Costs1. TXLeon Creek WatershedJun. 30, 2014Federal: $22,145,000Non-Federal: $11,925,000Total: $34,070,0002. MO, KSArmourdale and Central Industrial District Levee Units, Missouri River and Tributaries at Kansas CitysJan. 27, 2015Federal: $213,271,500Non-Federal: $114,838,500Total: $328,110,0003. KSCity of ManhattanApr. 30, 2015Federal: $16,151,000Non-Federal: $8,697,000Total: $24,848,0004. TNMill CreekOct. 16, 2015Federal: $17,950,000Non-Federal: $10,860,000Total: $28,810,0005. KSUpper Turkey Creek Basin Dec. 22, 2015Federal: $25,610,000Non-Federal: $13,790,000Total: $39,400,0006. NCPrincevilleFeb. 23, 2016Federal: $14,080,000Non-Federal: $7,582,000Total: $21,662,0007. CAAmerican River Common FeaturesApr. 26, 2016Federal: $890,046,900Non-Federal: $705,714,100Total: $1,595,761,0008. CAWest SacramentoApr. 26, 2016Federal: $788,861,000Non-Federal: $424,772,000Total: $1,213,633,000. ####
(3)Hurricane and storm damage risk reduction **A. State** **B. ** **Name** **C. ** **Date of ** Report of Chief of Engineers **D. ** **Estimated Initial ** Costs and Estimated Renourishment Costs1. SCColleton CountySep. 5, 2014Initial Federal: $14,448,000 Initial Non-Federal: $7,780,000Initial Total: $22,228,000 Renourishment Federal: $17,491,000Renourishment Non-Federal: $17,491,000Renourishment Total: $34,982,0002. FLFlagler CountyDec. 23, 2014Initial Federal: $9,561,000 Initial Non-Federal: $5,149,000 Initial Total: $14,710,000Renourishment Federal: $15,814,000Renourishment Non-Federal: $15,815,000Renourishment Total: $31,629,0003. NCCarteret CountyDec. 23, 2014Initial Federal: $25,468,000Initial Non-Federal: $13,714,000 Initial Total: $39,182,000 Renourishment Federal: $120,428,000Renourishment Non-Federal: $120,429,000Renourishment Total: $240,857,0004. NJHereford Inlet to Cape May Inlet, Cape May CountyJan. 23, 2015Initial Federal: $14,823,000Initial Non-Federal: $7,981,000Initial Total: $22,804,000Renourishment Federal: $43,501,000Renourishment Non-Federal: $43,501,000Renourishment Total: $87,002,0005. LAWest Shore Lake PontchartrainJun. 12, 2015Federal: $483,496,650Non-Federal: $260,344,350Total: $743,841,0006. CASan Diego CountyApr. 26, 2016Initial Federal: $20,953,000Initial Non-Federal: $11,282,000Initial Total: $32,235,000Renourishment Federal: $70,785,000Renourishment Non-Federal: $70,785,000Renourishment Total: $141,570,000. ####
(4)Ecosystem Restoration **A. State** **B. ** **Name** **C. ** **Date of ** Report of Chief of Engineers **D.** ** Estimated ** Costs1. FLCentral EvergladesDec. 23, 2014Federal: $993,131,000Non-Federal: $991,544,000Total: $1,984,675,0002. WASkokomish RiverDec. 14, 2015Federal: $13,168,000Non-Federal: $7,091,000Total: $20,259,0003. WAPuget SoundSep. 16, 2016Federal: $300,009,000Non-Federal: $161,543,000Total: $461,552,000. ####
(5)Flood risk management and ecosystem restoration **A. State** **B. ** **Name** **C. ** **Date of ** Report of Chief of Engineers **D.** ** Estimated ** Costs1. IL, WIUpper Des Plaines River and TributariesJun. 8, 2015Federal: $204,860,000Non-Federal: $110,642,000Total: $315,502,000. ####
(6)Flood risk management, ecosystem restoration, and recreation **A. State** **B. ** **Name** **C. ** **Date of ** Report of Chief of Engineers **D.** ** Estimated ** Costs1. CASouth San Francisco Bay ShorelineDec. 18, 2015Federal: $70,511,000Non-Federal: $106,689,000Total: $177,200,000. ####
(7)Ecosystem restoration and recreation **A. State** **B. ** **Name** **C. ** **Date of ** Report of Chief of Engineers **D.** ** Estimated ** Costs1. ORWillamette RiverDec. 14, 2015Federal: $19,531,000Non-Federal: $10,845,000Total: $30,376,0002. CALos Angeles RiverDec. 18, 2015Federal: $373,413,500Non-Federal: $1,046,893,500Total: $1,420,307,000. ####
(8)Hurricane and storm damage risk reduction and ecosystem restoration **A. State** **B. ** **Name** **C. ** **Date of ** Report of Chief of Engineers **D.** ** Estimated ** Costs1. LASouthwest Coastal LouisianaJul. 29, 2016Federal: $2,054,386,100Non-Federal: $1,106,207,900Total: $3,160,594,000. ####
(9)Modifications and other projects **A. State** **B. ** **Name** **C. ** **Date of ** Decision Document **D.** ** Estimated ** Costs1. TXUpper Trinity RiverMay 21, 2008Federal: $526,500,000Non-Federal: $283,500,000Total: $810,000,0002. KS, MOTurkey Creek BasinMay 13, 2016Federal: $101,491,650Non-Federal: $54,649,350Total: $156,141,0003. KYOhio River ShorelineMay 13, 2016Federal: $20,309,900Non-Federal: $10,936,100Total: $31,246,0004. MOBlue River BasinMay 13, 2016Federal: $36,326,250Non-Federal: $12,108,750Total: $48,435,0005. FLPicayune StrandJul. 15, 2016Federal: $313,166,000Non-Federal: $313,166,000Total: $626,332,0006. MOSwope Park Industrial Area, Blue RiverJul. 15, 2016Federal: $21,033,350Non-Federal: $11,325,650Total: $32,359,0007. AZRio de Flag, FlagstaffSep. 21, 2016Federal: $66,844,900Non-Federal: $36,039,100Total: $102,884,0008. TXHouston Ship ChannelNov. 4, 2016Federal: $381,773,000Non-Federal: $127,425,000Total: $509,198,000.
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
U.S. Code
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 1401
PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources