Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTE-COMPILATIONS · 21st Century Cures Act · Sec. 3055

Sec. 3055. CLASSIFICATION PANELS

513 words·~2 min read·/statute-compilations/comps-13005/sec-3055

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

## SEC. 3055 CLASSIFICATION PANELS ###
(a)Classification Panels Paragraph
(5)of section 513(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360c(b)) is amended— ####
(1)by striking “(5)” and inserting “(5)(A)”; and ####
(2)by adding at the end the following: > > ##### “(B) > > When a device is specifically the subject of review by a classification panel, the Secretary shall— > > > ###### “(i) > > ensure that adequate expertise is represented on the classification panel to assess— > > > ###### “(I) > > the disease or condition which the device is intended to cure, treat, mitigate, prevent, or diagnose; and > > > ###### “(II) > > the technology of the device; and > > > ###### “(ii) > > provide an opportunity for the person whose device is specifically the subject of panel review to provide recommendations on the expertise needed among the voting members of the panel. > > > ##### “(C) > > For purposes of subparagraph (B)(i), the term ‘adequate expertise’ means that the membership of the classification panel includes— > > > ###### “(i) > > two or more voting members, with a specialty or other expertise clinically relevant to the device under review; and > > > ###### “(ii) > > at least one voting member who is knowledgeable about the technology of the device. > > > ##### “(D) > > The Secretary shall provide an annual opportunity for patients, representatives of patients, and sponsors of medical device submissions to provide recommendations for individuals with appropriate expertise to fill voting member positions on classification panels.” > . ###
(b)Panel Review Process Section 513(b)(6) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360c(b)(6)) is amended— ####
(1)in subparagraph (A)(iii), by inserting before the period at the end “, including, subject to the discretion of the panel chairperson, by designating a representative who will be provided a time during the panel meeting to address the panel for the purpose of correcting misstatements of fact or providing clarifying information, and permitting the person or representative to call on experts within the person’s organization to address such specific issues in the time provided”; and ####
(2)by striking subparagraph
(B)and inserting the following new subparagraph: > > ##### “(B) > > > ######
(i)> > Any meeting of a classification panel with respect to the review of a device shall— > > > ###### “(I) > > provide adequate time for initial presentations by the person whose device is specifically the subject of such review and by the Secretary; and > > > ###### “(II) > > encourage free and open participation by all interested persons. > > > ###### “(ii) > > Following the initial presentations described in clause (i), the panel may— > > > ###### “(I) > > pose questions to a designated representative described in subparagraph (A)(iii); and > > > ###### “(II) > > consider the responses to such questions in the panel’s review of the device.” > .
Connectionstraces to 1
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 3055
CLASSIFICATION PANELS
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.