Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTE-COMPILATIONS · Justice for All Reauthorization Act of 2016 · Sec. 9

Sec. 9. PAUL COVERDELL FORENSIC SCIENCES IMPROVEMENT GRANTS

529 words·~2 min read·/statute-compilations/comps-12658/sec-9

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

## SEC. 9 PAUL COVERDELL FORENSIC SCIENCES IMPROVEMENT GRANTS ###
(a)Grants Part BB of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3797j) is amended— ####
(1)in section 2802(2) (42 U.S.C. 3797k(2)), by inserting after “bodies” the following: “and, except with regard to any medical examiner’s office, or coroner’s office in the State, is accredited by an accrediting body that is a signatory to an internationally recognized arrangement and that offers accreditation to forensic science conformity assessment bodies using an accreditation standard that is recognized by that internationally recognized arrangement, or attests, in a manner that is legally binding and enforceable, to use a portion of the grant amount to prepare and apply for such accreditation not more than 2 years after the date on which a grant is awarded under section 2801”; ####
(2)in section 2803(a) (42 U.S.C. 3797l(a))— #####
(A)in paragraph (1)— ######
(i)by striking “Seventy-five percent” and inserting “Eighty-five percent”; and ######
(ii)by striking “75 percent” and inserting “85 percent”; #####
(B)in paragraph (2), by striking “Twenty-five percent” and inserting “Fifteen percent”; and #####
(C)in paragraph (3), by striking “0.6 percent” and inserting “1 percent”; ####
(3)in section 2804(a) (42 U.S.C. 3797m(a))— #####
(A)in paragraph (2)— ######
(i)by inserting “impression evidence,” after “latent prints,”; and ######
(ii)by inserting “digital evidence, fire evidence,” after “toxicology,”; #####
(B)in paragraph (3), by inserting “and medicolegal death investigators” after “laboratory personnel”; and #####
(C)by inserting at the end the following: > > #### “(4) > > To address emerging forensic science issues (such as statistics, contextual bias, and uncertainty of measurement) and emerging forensic science technology (such as high throughput automation, statistical software, and new types of instrumentation). > > > #### “(5) > > To educate and train forensic pathologists. > > > #### “(6) > > To fund medicolegal death investigation systems to facilitate accreditation of medical examiner and coroner offices and certification of medicolegal death investigators.” > ; and ####
(4)in section 2806(a) (42 U.S.C. 3797o(a))— #####
(A)in paragraph (3), by striking “and” at the end; #####
(B)by redesignating paragraph
(4)as paragraph (5); and #####
(C)by inserting after paragraph
(3)the following: > > #### “(4) > > the progress of any unaccredited forensic science service provider receiving grant funds toward obtaining accreditation; and” > . ###
(b)Authorization of appropriations Section 1001(a)(24) of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3793(a)(24)) is amended— ####
(1)in subparagraph (H), by striking “and” at the end; ####
(2)in subparagraph (I), by striking the period at the end and inserting “; and”; and ####
(3)by adding at the end the following: > > ##### “(J) > > $13,500,000 for fiscal year 2017; > > > ##### “(K) > > $18,500,000 for fiscal year 2018; > > > ##### “(L) > > $19,000,000 for fiscal year 2019; > > > ##### “(M) > > $21,000,000 for fiscal year 2020; and > > > ##### “(N) > > $23,000,000 for fiscal year 2021.” > .
Connectionstraces to 6
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 9
PAUL COVERDELL FORENSIC SCIENCES IMPROVEMENT GRANTS
Cites 6Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.