Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTE-COMPILATIONS · Anti-Border Corruption Act of 2010 · Sec. 2

Sec. 2. FINDINGS

206 words·~1 min read·/statute-compilations/comps-12617/sec-2

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

## SEC. 2 FINDINGS **[**[6 U.S.C. 221 note](/us/usc/t6/s221)**]** Congress makes the following findings: ####
(1)According to the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Homeland Security, since 2003, 129 U.S. Customs and Border Protection officials have been arrested on corruption charges and, during 2009, 576 investigations were opened on allegations of improper conduct by U.S. Customs and Border Protection officials. ####
(2)To foster integrity in the workplace, established policy of U.S. Customs and Border Protection calls for— #####
(A)all job applicants for law enforcement positions at U.S. Customs and Border Protection to receive a polygraph examination and a background investigation before being offered employment; and #####
(B)relevant employees to receive a periodic background reinvestigation every 5 years. ####
(3)According to the Office of Internal Affairs of U.S. Customs and Border Protection— #####
(A)in 2009, less than 15 percent of applicants for jobs with U.S. Customs and Border Protection received polygraph examinations; #####
(B)as of March 2010, U.S. Customs and Border Protection had a backlog of approximately 10,000 periodic background reinvestigations of existing employees; and #####
(C)without additional resources, by the end of fiscal year 2010, the backlog of periodic background reinvestigations will increase to approximately 19,000.
Connectionstraces to 1
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 2
FINDINGS
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.