Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTE-COMPILATIONS · Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2016 · Sec. 316

Sec. 316. HIGHER VOLUME PORT AREA REGULATORY DEFINITION CHANGE

180 words·~1 min read·/statute-compilations/comps-12457/sec-316

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

## SEC. 316 HIGHER VOLUME PORT AREA REGULATORY DEFINITION CHANGE ###
(a)In General Subsection
(a)of section 710 of the Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2010 (Public Law 111-281; 124 Stat. 2986) is amended to read as follows: > > ### “(a) Higher Volume Ports > > Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the requirements of subparts D, F, and G of part 155 of title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, that apply to the higher volume port area for the Strait of Juan de Fuca at Port Angeles, Washington (including any water area within 50 nautical miles seaward), to and including Puget Sound, shall apply, in the same manner, and to the same extent, to the Strait of Juan de Fuca at Cape Flattery, Washington (including any water area within 50 nautical miles seaward), to and including Puget Sound.” > . ###
(b)Conforming Amendment Subsection
(b)of such section is amended by striking “the modification of the higher volume port area definition required by subsection (a).” and inserting “higher volume port requirements made applicable under subsection (a).”.
Connections2 off-index
2 references not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 111-281
  • 124 Stat. 2986
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 316
HIGHER VOLUME PORT AREA REGULATORY DEFINITION CHANGE
Pub. L.Pub. L. 111-281
Stat.124 Stat. 2986
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.