Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTE-COMPILATIONS · Safe Drinking Water Act Amendments of 1996 · Sec. 3

Sec. 3. FINDINGS

448 words·~2 min read·/statute-compilations/comps-11610/sec-3

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

## SEC. 3 FINDINGS **[**[42 U.S.C. 300f note](/us/usc/t42/s300f)**]** The Congress finds that— ####
(1)safe drinking water is essential to the protection of public health; ####
(2)because the requirements of the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300f et seq.) now exceed the financial and technical capacity of some public water systems, especially many small public water systems, the Federal Government needs to provide assistance to communities to help the communities meet Federal drinking water requirements; ####
(3)the Federal Government commits to maintaining and improving its partnership with the States in the administration and implementation of the Safe Drinking Water Act; ####
(4)States play a central role in the implementation of safe drinking water programs, and States need increased financial resources and appropriate flexibility to ensure the prompt and effective development and implementation of drinking water programs; ####
(5)the existing process for the assessment and selection of additional drinking water contaminants needs to be revised and improved to ensure that there is a sound scientific basis for setting priorities in establishing drinking water regulations; ####
(6)procedures for assessing the health effects of contaminants establishing drinking water standards should be revised to provide greater opportunity for public education and participation; ####
(7)in considering the appropriate level of regulation for contaminants in drinking water, risk assessment, based on sound and objective science, and benefit-cost analysis are important analytical tools for improving the efficiency and effectiveness of drinking water regulations to protect human health; ####
(8)more effective protection of public health requires— #####
(A)a Federal commitment to set priorities that will allow scarce Federal, State, and local resources to be targeted toward the drinking water problems of greatest public health concern; #####
(B)maximizing the value of the different and complementary strengths and responsibilities of the Federal and State governments in those States that have primary enforcement responsibility for the Safe Drinking Water Act; and #####
(C)prevention of drinking water contamination through well-trained system operators, water systems with adequate managerial, technical, and financial capacity, and enhanced protection of source waters of public water systems; ####
(9)compliance with the requirements of the Safe Drinking Water Act continues to be a concern at public water systems experiencing technical and financial limitations, and Federal, State, and local governments need more resources and more effective authority to attain the objectives of the Safe Drinking Water Act; and ####
(10)consumers served by public water systems should be provided with information on the source of the water they are drinking and its quality and safety, as well as prompt notification of any violation of drinking water regulations. # TITLE I AMENDMENTS TO SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 3
FINDINGS
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.