Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTE-COMPILATIONS · Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 · Sec. 6002

Sec. 6002. REVIEW OF CORPS OF ENGINEERS ASSETS

523 words·~2 min read·/statute-compilations/comps-11481/sec-6002

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

## SEC. 6002 REVIEW OF CORPS OF ENGINEERS ASSETS ###
(a)Assessment The Secretary shall conduct an assessment of projects constructed by the Secretary for which the Secretary continues to have financial or operational responsibility. ###
(b)Inventory Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020, the Secretary shall, based on the assessment carried out under subsection (a), develop an inventory of projects or portions of projects— ####
(1)that are not needed for the missions of the Corps of Engineers; ####
(2)the modification of which, including though the use of structural features, nonstructural features, or natural features or nature-based features (as those terms are defined in section 1184(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 2289a(a)), could improve the sustainable operations of the project, or reduce operation and maintenance costs for the project; or ####
(3)that are no longer having project purposes adequately met by the Corps of Engineers, because of deferment of maintenance or other challenges, and the divestment of which to a non-Federal entity could better meet the local and regional needs for operation and maintenance. ###
(c)Criteria In conducting the assessment under subsection
(a)and developing the inventory under subsection (b), the Secretary shall use the following criteria: ####
(1)The extent to which the project aligns with the current missions of the Corps of Engineers. ####
(2)The economic and environmental impacts of the project on existing communities in the vicinity of the project. ####
(3)The extent to which the divestment or modification of the project could reduce operation and maintenance costs of the Corps of Engineers. ####
(4)The extent to which the divestment or modification of the project is in the public interest. ####
(5)The extent to which investment of additional Federal resources in the project proposed for divestment or modification, including investment needed to bring the project to a good state of repair, is in the public interest. ####
(6)The extent to which the authorized purpose of the project is no longer being met. ###
(d)Recommendations of Non-federal Interests A non-Federal interest for a project may recommend that the Secretary include such project in the assessment or inventory required under this section. ###
(e)Report to Congress ####
(1)In general Upon completion of the inventory required by subsection (b), the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, and make publicly available, a report containing the findings of the Secretary with respect to the assessment and inventory required under this section. ####
(2)Inclusion The Secretary shall list in an appendix any recommendation of a non-Federal interest made with respect to a project under subsection
(d)that the Secretary determines not to include in the inventory developed under subsection (b), based on the criteria in subsection (c), including information about the request and the reasons for the Secretary’s determination. **[**Section 6003 of this Act was repealed by section 360(d) of division AA of Public Law 116–260.**]**
Connectionstraces to 2
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 6002
REVIEW OF CORPS OF ENGINEERS ASSETS
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.