Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTE-COMPILATIONS · National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 · Sec. 261

Sec. 261. ESTABLISHMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY REVIEW AND ADVISORY BOARD

502 words·~2 min read·/statute-compilations/comps-11141/sec-261

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

## SEC. 261 ESTABLISHMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY REVIEW AND ADVISORY BOARD ###
(a)In General Chapter 7 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section: > > ## “SEC. 189 Communications Security Review and Advisory Board > > **[**[10 U.S.C. 189](/us/usc/t10/s189)**]** > > > ### “(a) Establishment > > There shall be in the Department of Defense a Communications Security Review and Advisory Board (in this section referred to as the ‘Board’) to review and assess the communications security, cryptographic modernization, and related key management activities of the Department and provide advice to the Secretary with respect to such activities. > > > ### “(b) Members > > > ####
(1)> > The Secretary shall determine the number of members of the Board. > > > #### “(2) > > The Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense shall serve as chairman of the Board. > > > #### “(3) > > The Secretary shall appoint officers in the grade of general or admiral and civilian employees of the Department of Defense in the Senior Executive Service to serve as members of the Board. > > > ### “(c) Responsibilities > > The Board shall— > > > #### “(1) > > monitor the overall communications security, cryptographic modernization, and key management efforts of the Department, including activities under major defense acquisition programs (as defined in section 139c of this title), by— > > > ##### “(A) > > requiring each Chief Information Officer of each military department to report the communications security activities of the military department to the Board; > > > ##### “(B) > > tracking compliance of each military department with respect to communications security modernization efforts; > > > ##### “(C) > > validating lifecycle communications security modernization plans for major defense acquisition programs; > > > #### “(2) > > validate the need to replace cryptographic equipment based on the expiration dates of the equipment and evaluate the risks of continuing to use cryptographic equipment after such expiration dates; > > > #### “(3) > > convene in-depth program reviews for specific cryptographic modernization developments with respect to validating requirements and identifying programmatic risks; > > > #### “(4) > > develop a long-term roadmap for communications security to identify potential issues and ensure synchronization with major planning documents; and > > > #### “(5) > > advise the Secretary on the cryptographic posture of the Department, including budgetary recommendations. > > > ### “(d) Exclusion of Certain Programs > > The Board shall not include the consideration of programs funded under the National Intelligence Program (as defined in section 3(6) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(6))) in carrying out this section.” > . ###
(b)Clerical Amendment The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding after the item relating to section 188 the following new item:" “189. Communications Security Review and Advisory Board” ".
Connectionstraces to 2
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 261
ESTABLISHMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY REVIEW AND ADVISORY BOARD
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.