Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTE-COMPILATIONS · National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 · Sec. 218

Sec. 218. REVIEW OF SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT FOR F-35 AIRCRAFT

450 words·~2 min read·/statute-compilations/comps-11141/sec-218

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

## SEC. 218 REVIEW OF SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT FOR F-35 AIRCRAFT ###
(a)Software Development Program ####
(1)Review The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall establish an independent team consisting of subject matter experts to review the development of software for the F-35 aircraft program (in this subsection referred to as the “software development program”), including by reviewing the progress made with respect to— #####
(A)managing the software development program; and #####
(B)delivering critical software capability in accordance with current program milestones. ####
(2)Report Not later than March 3, 2014, the Under Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the review under paragraph (1). Such report shall include the following: #####
(A)An assessment by the independent team with respect to whether the software development program— ######
(i)has been successful in meeting the key milestone dates occurring before the date of the report; and ######
(ii)will be successful in meeting the established program schedule. #####
(B)Any recommendations of the independent team with respect to improving the software development program to ensure that, in support of the start of initial operational testing, the established program schedule is met on time. #####
(C)If the independent team determines that the software development program will be unable to deliver the full complement of software within the established program schedule, any potential alternatives that the independent team considers appropriate to deliver such software within such schedule. ###
(b)Autonomic Logistics Information System Sustainment Report Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary, in consultation with the Joint Strike Fighter Joint Program Office, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on current plans, as of the date of the report, for long-term sustainment of the autonomic logistics information system of F-35 aircraft. Such report shall include the following: ####
(1)Current plans for acquisition of technical data rights to autonomic logistics information system software and the potential competitive sustainment of elements of the autonomic logistics information system. ####
(2)How sustainment of the autonomic logistics information system may take advantage of public-private partnerships authorized by section 2474 of title 10, United States Code, including schedules for actions necessary for such sustainment. ####
(3)Any current plan to select, designate, and activate any Government-owned and Government-operated site to serve as the autonomic logistics operating unit. ####
(4)Current plans to ensure that the autonomic logistics information system provides total asset visibility and accountability, including asset valuation and tracking, and for potential integration with other automated logistics systems. **[**Section 219 was repealed by section 1004(b)(1) of division A of Public Law 119–60.**]**
Connections1 off-index
1 reference not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 119-60
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 218
REVIEW OF SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT FOR F-35 AIRCRAFT
Pub. L.Pub. L. 119-60
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.