Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTE-COMPILATIONS · Riegle Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994 · Sec. 350

Sec. 350. REVISING REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR TRANSFERS OF ALL TYPES OF ASSETS WITH RECOURSE

333 words·~2 min read·/statute-compilations/comps-10825/sec-350

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

## SEC. 350 REVISING REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR TRANSFERS OF ALL TYPES OF ASSETS WITH RECOURSE **[**[12 U.S.C. 4808](/us/usc/t12/s4808)**]** ###
(a)Review and Revision of Regulations ####
(1)In general During the 180-day period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, each appropriate Federal banking agency shall, consistent with the principles of safety and soundness and the public interest— #####
(A)review the agency's regulations and written policies relating to transfers of assets with recourse by insured depository institutions; and #####
(B)in consultation with the other Federal banking agencies, promulgate regulations that better reflect the exposure of an insured depository institution to credit risk from transfers of assets with recourse. ####
(2)Regulations required Before the end of the 180-day period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, each appropriate Federal banking agency shall prescribe the regulations developed pursuant to paragraph (1)(B). ###
(b)Regulations Required ####
(1)In general After the end of the 180-day period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, the amount of risk-based capital required to be maintained, under regulations prescribed by the appropriate Federal banking agency, by any insured depository institution with respect to assets transferred with recourse by such institution may not exceed the maximum amount of recourse for which such institution is contractually liable under the recourse agreement. ####
(2)Exception for safety and soundness The appropriate Federal banking agency may require any insured depository institution to maintain risk-based capital in an amount greater than the amount determined under paragraph (1), if the agency determines, by regulation or order, that such higher amount is necessary for safety and soundness reasons. ###
(c)Coordination With Section 208(b) This section shall not be construed as superseding the applicability of section 208(b). ###
(d)Definitions For purposes of this section, the terms “**appropriate Federal banking agency**”, “Federal banking agency”, and “insured depository institution” have the same meanings as in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act. # TITLE IV MONEY LAUNDERING
Connectionstraces to 1
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 350
REVISING REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR TRANSFERS OF ALL TYPES OF ASSETS WITH RECOURSE
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.