Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTE-COMPILATIONS · Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995 · Sec. 517

Sec. 517. SENSE OF THE SENATE ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT

545 words·~2 min read·/statute-compilations/comps-1076/sec-517

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

## SEC. 517 SENSE OF THE SENATE ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT ###
(a)Senate Findings The Senate makes the following findings: ####
(1)The freedom and security of the international community rests on the sanctity of the rule of law. ####
(2)The international community is increasingly threatened by unlawful acts such as war crimes, genocide, aggression, crimes against humanity, terrorism, drug trafficking, money laundering, and other crimes of an international character. ####
(3)The prosecution of individuals suspected of carrying out such acts is often impeded by political and legal obstacles such as amnesties, disputes over extradition, differences in the structure and capabilities of national courts, and the lack of uniform guidelines under which to try such individuals. ####
(4)The war crimes trials held in the aftermath of World War II at Nuremberg, Germany, and Tokyo, Japan, demonstrated that fair and effective prosecution of war criminals could be carried out in an international forum. ####
(5)Since its inception in 1945 the United Nations has sought to build on the precedent established at the Nuremberg and Tokyo trials by establishing a permanent international criminal court with jurisdiction over crimes of an international character. ####
(6)United Nations General Assembly Resolution 44/39, adopted on December 4, 1989, called on the International Law Commission to study the feasibility of an international criminal court. ####
(7)In the years after passage of that resolution the International Law Commission has taken a number of steps to advance the debate over such a court, including— #####
(A)the provisional adoption of a draft Code of Crimes Against the Peace and Security of Mankind; #####
(B)the creation of a Working Group on an International Criminal Jurisdiction and the formulation by that Working Group of several concrete proposals for the establishment and operation of an international criminal court; and #####
(C)the determination that an international criminal court along the lines of that suggested by the Working Group is feasible and that the logical next step would be to proceed with the formal drafting of a statute for such a court. ####
(8)United Nations General Assembly Resolution 47/33, adopted on November 25, 1992, called on the International Law Commission to begin the process of drafting a statute for an international criminal court at its next session. ####
(9)Given the developments of recent years, the time is propitious for the United States to lend its support to this effort. ###
(b)Sense of the Senate It is the sense of the Senate that— ####
(1)the establishment of an international criminal court with jurisdiction over crimes of an international character would greatly strengthen the international rule of law; ####
(2)such a court would thereby serve the interests of the United States and the world community; and ####
(3)the United States delegation should make every effort to advance this proposal at the United Nations. ###
(c)Required Report Not later than 14 days after the date of enactment of this Act the President shall submit to the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a detailed report on developments relating to, and United States efforts in support of, the establishment of an international criminal court with jurisdiction over crimes of an international character.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.