Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTE-COMPILATIONS · Compilation 10423 · Sec. 1302

Sec. 1302. FUNDING ALLOCATIONS

506 words·~2 min read·/statute-compilations/comps-10423/sec-1302

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

## SEC. 1302 FUNDING ALLOCATIONS ###
(a)Funding for Specific Purposes Of the $475,500,000 authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2000 in section 301(23) for Cooperative Threat Reduction programs, not more than the following amounts may be obligated for the purposes specified: ####
(1)For strategic offensive arms elimination in Russia, $177,300,000. ####
(2)For strategic nuclear arms elimination in Ukraine, $41,800,000. ####
(3)For activities to support warhead dismantlement processing in Russia, $9,300,000. ####
(4)For security enhancements at chemical weapons storage sites in Russia, $20,000,000. ####
(5)For weapons transportation security in Russia, $15,200,000. ####
(6)For planning, design, and construction of a storage facility for Russian fissile material, $64,500,000. ####
(7)For weapons storage security in Russia, $99,000,000. ####
(8)For development of a cooperative program with the Government of Russia to eliminate the production of weapons grade plutonium at Russian reactors, $32,300,000. ####
(9)For biological weapons proliferation prevention activities in Russia, $12,000,000. ####
(10)For activities designated as Other Assessments/Administrative Support, $1,800,000. ####
(11)For defense and military contacts, $2,300,000. ###
(b)Report on Obligation or Expenditure of Funds for Other Purposes No fiscal year 2000 Cooperative Threat Reduction funds may be obligated or expended for a purpose other than a purpose listed in paragraphs
(1)through
(11)of subsection
(a)until 30 days after the date that the Secretary of Defense submits to Congress a report on the purpose for which the funds will be obligated or expended and the amount of funds to be obligated or expended. Nothing in the preceding sentence shall be construed as authorizing the obligation or expenditure of fiscal year 2000 Cooperative Threat Reduction funds for a purpose for which the obligation or expenditure of such funds is specifically prohibited under this title. ###
(c)Limited Authority To Vary Individual Amounts ####
(1)Subject to paragraphs
(2)and (3), in any case in which the Secretary of Defense determines that it is necessary to do so in the national interest, the Secretary may obligate amounts appropriated for fiscal year 2000 for a purpose listed in any of the paragraphs in subsection
(a)in excess of the amount specifically authorized for such purpose. ####
(2)An obligation of funds for a purpose stated in any of the paragraphs in subsection
(a)in excess of the specific amount authorized for such purpose may be made using the authority provided in paragraph
(1)only after— #####
(A)the Secretary submits to Congress notification of the intent to do so together with a complete discussion of the justification for doing so; and #####
(B)15 days have elapsed following the date of the notification. ####
(3)The Secretary may not, under the authority provided in paragraph (1), obligate amounts for the purposes stated in any of paragraphs
(4)through (6), (8), (10), or
(11)of subsection
(a)in excess of 115 percent of the amount specifically authorized for such purposes. **[**Section 1303 repealed by section 1351(7) of division A of Public Law 113–291.**]**
Connectionstraces to 1
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 1302
FUNDING ALLOCATIONS
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.