Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTE-COMPILATIONS · California Trail Interpretive Act · Sec. 102

Sec. 102. FINDINGS AND PURPOSES

216 words·~1 min read·/statute-compilations/comps-10416/sec-102

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

## SEC. 102 FINDINGS AND PURPOSES ###
(a)Findings Congress finds that— ####
(1)the nineteenth-century westward movement in the United States over the California National Historic Trail, which occurred from 1840 until the completion of the transcontinental railroad in 1869, was an important cultural and historical event in— #####
(A)the development of the western land of the United States; and #####
(B)the prevention of colonization of the west coast by Russia and the British Empire; ####
(2)the movement over the California Trail was completed by over 300,000 settlers, many of whom left records or stories of their journeys; and ####
(3)additional recognition and interpretation of the movement over the California Trail is appropriate in light of— #####
(A)the national scope of nineteenth-century westward movement in the United States; and #####
(B)the strong interest expressed by people of the United States in understanding their history and heritage. ###
(b)Purposes The purposes of this title are— ####
(1)to recognize the California Trail, including the Hastings Cutoff and the trail of the ill-fated Donner-Reed Party, for its national, historical, and cultural significance; and ####
(2)to provide the public with an interpretive facility devoted to the vital role of trails in the West in the development of the United States.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.